Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick note, re: coaching


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Such a mess, how many games have we abandoned the run? I think we ran 15 times yesterday. So the philosophy has been more like "Throw picks to guys sitting on routes they learned watching film, and get ran over by average RB's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see you back @Mr. Scot. Sorry to hear things are not going well at home.  You are the best poster on this board my friend no matter what the mouth breathers would have anyone believe. As one of the elders here I personally would hate to see you leave this place for something other than family.  May good fortune shine upon you in these troubled times my friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

It appears to me that the young prodigy has had his offense figured out.  I would say the odds are good they will not be competitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

We did get beat by Joe Judge and the New York football "Giants" backups' backups so nothing is out of the question.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Rhule is worse than Seifert. At least Seifert had success in the NFL prior to the Panthers and was a Super Bowl winning coach. Plus he did gift us Morgan, Jenkins and #89. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think Pederson would be a really good hire.  He's been there before, has plenty of knowledge about who he could bring in as NFL coaches and I think with a good DC hire he could turn this wreck around with Fitterer and Morgan.  He's an offensive guy so he'll make fixing that O-line priority #1.

I’m a big fan of hiring BBQ Dad as offensive coordinator and hiring Matt Eberflus as head coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They're sneaky good.  Very good.  And they had the personnel to match perfectly against us.   Seattle played really straight forward cover-2 and cover-3 pretty much all day.  They had some nice simulated pressures in cover-3 that baited us to move more quickly than we needed to.  They just totally cooked us.  It was a full Macdonald checkmate against Canales & the offense.       The recipe: Contain the run game enough (check) and have the LB & secondary athleticism to shut us down in the air (check)      For any team that can match our OL's run blocking, just run a cover 2/cover 3 all-day.  Similar to what the Saints did.  Pepper in some simulated pressures to bait Bryce while you're at it.  Bryce doesn't play the best against zone.  Huge weakness, averages like -.09 EPA/P in his career.  How that actualizes - from my eye test as a silly fan, he just doesn't have the velocity for the shorter/intermediates from in the pocket to the outside to get guys the ball in space vs zone.  His best games (Rams, Falcons) was when they had a blitz we caught, went man, or it was a critical down with a misdirect/PA and he had the space to throw a nice ball, sometimes with anticipation.  23rd rated QB against zone.  24th completion percentage against zone.  42nd against zone ANY/A with a clean pocket.  ANY/A being one of the more consistent correlations to wins you can find out of the EPA stuff you'll see nowadays.  He doesn't even crack the top 32 for eligible QBs.    
    • well, I have always said Sam Darnold is Sam Darnold.  Which he always proves to be.  NYJ Sam was at BOA Sunday.   I think Bryce criticism is a one of one.  Because he is unicorn. 
    • JT's Stats for the 2025 season. REC: 29 / YARDS: 190/ TD: 1/ Yards per catch: 6.6 The data seems to indicate that JT is not a huge component of our offense. His presence (or lack of it) is not what cost us that game yesterday. Sanders is a big guy but he seems to go down as soon as contact is made. He hasn't produced any "wow moments" in during his 2 years with the team. So far he's proven to be a JAG. I'd rather see Tremble and Evan on the field as our # 1 and #2 TE's.  
×
×
  • Create New...