Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick note, re: coaching


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

Only difference is that this guy takes the blah to a whole nother layer of suck. 

He's worse than either coach. At least with them we had a couple good years and there was some positive traction early. 

Rhule has absolutely nothing going for him.

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Much as I dislike hyperbole, there's an argument to be made that Rhule might be our worst head coach.

Closest competition would be Seifert.

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

By his own words, Rhule's philosophy boils down to "run the ball and play defense".

Basically, he's no different than the coaches we had under Richardson.

Such a mess, how many games have we abandoned the run? I think we ran 15 times yesterday. So the philosophy has been more like "Throw picks to guys sitting on routes they learned watching film, and get ran over by average RB's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see you back @Mr. Scot. Sorry to hear things are not going well at home.  You are the best poster on this board my friend no matter what the mouth breathers would have anyone believe. As one of the elders here I personally would hate to see you leave this place for something other than family.  May good fortune shine upon you in these troubled times my friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

It appears to me that the young prodigy has had his offense figured out.  I would say the odds are good they will not be competitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Still wonder how this year's record is gonna wind up.

It's hard to picture us being competitive with the Bucs or the Bills. Atlanta maybe depending on how we're trending, and the Saints have named Taysom Hill their starting QB so there's that.

We did get beat by Joe Judge and the New York football "Giants" backups' backups so nothing is out of the question.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I was just thinking that. It would be hard to choose who was worse between those two. 

The record doesn't tell the whole story.

Rhule is worse than Seifert. At least Seifert had success in the NFL prior to the Panthers and was a Super Bowl winning coach. Plus he did gift us Morgan, Jenkins and #89. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

I think Pederson would be a really good hire.  He's been there before, has plenty of knowledge about who he could bring in as NFL coaches and I think with a good DC hire he could turn this wreck around with Fitterer and Morgan.  He's an offensive guy so he'll make fixing that O-line priority #1.

I’m a big fan of hiring BBQ Dad as offensive coordinator and hiring Matt Eberflus as head coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Poodle?........poodles are very smart and active dogs and don't deserve the insult.
    • Let's just make this clear. The best the passing offense has looked early in the season when the games actually mattered since 2023 was in Seattle with Reich in 2023 and in Vegas in 2024 with Canales. Both were Andy Dalton starts. Bryce Young has looked abysmal with now two different coaching staffs to start the season three consecutive years. No we cannot exclude the Reich year and take ourselves seriously.
    • Like I said, I give him a pass on that first season. I just don't think any QB would have been successful given the coaching.  I look at bryce and see what he did last season after his benching. Apparently everyone else looks at Bryce in 2023 and 2025 only. We all see what we want to see.
×
×
  • Create New...