Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meet new OC Jeff Nixon (puke)


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Zod said:

What a coincidence that the best man for the job is Rhule's high school buddy!

Meh, who else could it be on such short notice?   We weren't going to go outside the organization to hire someone for five games, and I assume that virtually everyone on the staff is a Rhule selection so it was going to be someone that Rhule selected previously.  And Nixon seems to have the most polished resume of the bunch.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Meh, who else could it be on such short notice?   We weren't going to go outside the organization to hire someone for five games, and I assume that virtually everyone on the staff is a Rhule selection so it was going to be someone that Rhule selected previously.  And Nixon seems to have the most polished resume of the bunch.

Sean Ryan's actually got more pro level experience (14 years to 9) as well as a more diversified pro skill set (quarterbacks, runningbacks and receivers vs runningbacks and tight ends).

Nixon's technically been a coordinator, but it was actually a co-coordinator, and even that only for three seasons at the college level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sean Ryan's actually got more pro level experience (14 years to 9) as well as a more diversified pro skill set (quarterbacks, runningbacks and receivers vs runningbacks and tight ends).

Nixon's technically been a coordinator, but it was actually a co-coordinator, and even that only for three seasons at the college level.

Even so, its still meh. Not enough of a difference to matter much.  Either of them have more experience than Brady.  

Plus, his last job was with the Lions.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Even so, its still meh. Not enough of a difference to matter much.  Either of them have more experience than Brady.  

Plus, his last job was with the Lions.  

From a profile of Matt Rhule by Joe Person in The Athletic...

Rhule also liked the friendships that were forged on a football field, some of which last a lifetime. Jeff Nixon, State College’s star running back and Rhule’s best friend, is the Panthers’ running backs coach on Rhule’s first NFL staff.

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nixon worked under Andy Reid for 4 years on damn good football teams.  Then worked with a solid RB group for years in Miami.  Y’all act like we could go out and get someone off the street for a few weeks.  I’ll take an Andy Reid understudy over a former Lions coach any day.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From a profile of Matt Rhule by Joe Person in The Athletic...

Rhule also liked the friendships that were forged on a football field, some of which last a lifetime. Jeff Nixon, State College’s star running back and Rhule’s best friend, is the Panthers’ running backs coach on Rhule’s first NFL staff.

Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Ryan_(American_football_coach)#Detroit_Lions_(2019–2020)

Quote

On January 29, 2019, Ryan was hired by the Detroit Lions to be their quarterbacks coach under head coach Matt Patricia.[8] He was the interim offensive play caller for the team's week 16 game in 2020 against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers due to interim head coach Darrell Bevell missing the game under COVID-19 protocols.

What it doesn't say, they lost the Tampa game 47-7

And then there was this gem.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/game/_/gameId/401220318

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Don't really know that much can be learned from a single game sample where the words "under head coach Matt Patricia" are applicable.

Regardless, I don't know whether Sean Ryan would make a good OC. I don't know whether Jeff Nixon is going to make a good OC yet either.

I just know that if you're going strictly by resumés, Ryan's is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't really know that much can be learned from a single game sample where the words "under head coach Matt Patricia" are applicable.

Regardless, I don't know whether Sean Ryan would make a good OC. I don't know whether Jeff Nixon is going to make a good OC yet either.

I just know that if you're going strictly by resumés, Ryan's is better.

Depends on how you read resume's.  Years of experience are to me less important than quality of experience, and Jeff Nixon's three years with Reid trumps anything on Ryan's. Of course, in the end, the actual difference is rather small.  

 But I think (and this is not directed at you, but to the audience at large) it seems a strange thing for so many of the board patrons to be so concerned about Rhule hiring a guy he likes, who may only be here for five games.  Almost all coaches hire their buddies/friends/former coworkers/people they are comfortable with as coordinators.  I thought Ruhle hiring Brady was odd due to Brady's lack of experience and the fact that Ruhle hadn't worked with him much.  This actually seems more normal.      

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Depends on how you read resume's.  Years of experience are to me less important than quality of experience, and Jeff Nixon's three years with Reid trumps anything on Ryan's. Of course, in the end, the actual difference is rather small.  

 But I think (and this is not directed at you, but to the audience at large) it seems a strange thing for so many of the board patrons to be so concerned about Rhule hiring a guy he likes, who may only be here for five games.  Almost all coaches hire their buddies/friends/former coworkers/people they are comfortable with as coordinators.  I thought Ruhle hiring Brady was odd due to Brady's lack of experience and the fact that Ruhle hadn't worked with him much.  This actually seems more normal.      

I have zero problems with head coaches hiring guys they like or who have worked for them before if those guys are also qualified for / good at their jobs.

When the head coach isn't good at his, that lessens the likelihood that the assistants will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I have zero problems with head coaches hiring guys they like or who have worked for them before if those guys are also qualified for / good at their jobs.

When the head coach isn't good at his, that lessens the likelihood that the assistants will be.

I agree completely, and no I don't trust Rhule.

I just distrust him equally regardless of who from our current staff fills in as interim OC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...