Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing resumés


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pre-Panthers job histories or our old OC and his replacement pulled from the Panthers 2021 media guide...

JOE BRADY

 Linebackers Coach - William & Mary (2013-2014)

Graduate Assistant - Penn State (2015-2016)

Offensive Assistant - New Orleans Saints (2017-2018)

Passing Game Coordinator / Wide Receivers Coach - LSU (2019)

 

JEFF NIXON

Student Assistant - Penn State (1997)

Runningbacks Coach - Princeton (1998)

Runningbacks Coach - Shippensburg University (1999-2002)

Runningbacks / Tight Ends / Special Teams Coach - Tennessee-Chattanooga (2003-2005)

Runningbacks Coach - Temple (2006)

Offensive / Special Teams Assistant - Philadelphia Eagles (2007-2010)

Runningbacks Coach - Miami Dolphins (2011-2015)

Tight Ends Coach - San Francisco 49ers (2016)

Co-Offensive Coordinator / Runningbacks Coach - Baylor (2017-2019)

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well let's see what Nixon can do with an XFL offensive line.

That being said hopefully he doesn't bunch up our wide receivers and tight ends in the same area of the field and call the same plays each week.

I would say it would be nice to see us coming out of multiple formations, but this late and with this line I don't know if that's really feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nixon is OC for 5-games and that is it. This move looks like desperation. Firing Brady needed to be done but it did not fix the multiple problems this team has. 
Rhule should be fired just on how poorly the QB situation was handled. A rebuilding team giving away valuable draft picks with little value in return is another fireable offense. 

Edited by thennek
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We fell for the hype.

Sean McVay's success has sent a bunch of other teams looking for the next version of him. 

We should at least have targeted one of his friend group from Nashville. Can't say Arthur Smith has looked great, but not bad.  Players are still fighting and scrappy for him when it was known ATL wouldn't be good.

Matt LeFleur-Smith-McVay are besties off the field with a few more dudes in the equation.  The league is smitten with this group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...