Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2020 Offensive Line vs. 2021 Offensive Line

thennek

By thennek,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

thennek Experienced

thennek

Posted
Posted

Let's talk O-Line and solutions for 2022:  Of course, we all want a new LT and etc, but is this realistic, and with this coaching staff does it make a difference:

The 2020 O-Line was ranked 18 at year end.  Okung played like half the games, and so LT was a revolving door of Okung, Little and Scott.  LG was also a revolving door of Reed, Daley, and Schofield.  C was mostly Paradis but some Larsen.  RG was John Miller, and LT Moton.  In 2020, the right side of the Panthers O-line with Miller and Moton was average to sometimes solid.  Even with all of the changes at LT and LG, the Panthers 2020 O-line was clearly better than the 2021 O-line (not that the 2020 line was super great, but easily better than 2021).  Latest rankings show the Panthers 2021 O-line to be 'near the bottom'.  

So, my question is why is the 2021 O-line so much worse than 2020?  Clearly, Miller has taken a step back as has Scott and Daley.  Losing Larsen, Reed, Schofield, Okung, and Little should not have made this much of a negative difference.  Not that Erving, Eflein, Daley, Scott, Miller and etc are top tier offensive lineman, but I don't see how they are significantly worse than last year.  Obviously, more talent is needed, but I am wondering if there may be a combination of several other things missing.  In other words, maybe talent would not be enough to fix the problem.  With the right scheme and consistency, this o-line could/should be significantly better.  This would be a coaching issue.....

One thing noticed is the Panthers have had a combination of 12 different starters in their 15-games this year.  Some of this is due to injury, but much of it is due to coaching decisions.  Consistency and scheme seem to be missing from this o-line.  As an example, Gross and Wharton had consistency and were even were neighbors and carpooled together.  Those two had mojo when playing side by side.  Either the Panthers have not 'picked guys' that fit 'their scheme', or they are not putting them in a position to be successful.  Too many changes....IE - Brady C has played, RT, RG, LG, and LT this year as a rookie.  How can this be setting him up for success?  Scott and Daley has also been moved around quite a bit.  Even the best players are not able to constantly change positions.  Again, Miller and Moton were a pretty good combo last year, but are not this year. 

With all of the holes on this team (DT, MLB, S, TE, QB) and with limited draft picks I don't think the Panthers will have the resources to completely gut the o-line and start over.  And if scheme, consistently, and coaching is contributing to terrible o-line play, new talent will not make that much of a difference.  I truly believe some of these o-line guys are salvageable enough to be adequate...clearly need a stud C and LG as maybe, just maybe Brady could be an avg LT.

BTW - Rhule has made a complete mess of this 'rebuild'.  The QB situation could not be worse but that is another topic, but unfortunately related to the o-line.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlitzMonster Mentor

BlitzMonster

Posted
Posted

This is a great post !   Very good observation and thinking about the O-line.

I am also surprised at how bad our OL has played this season.  The moving players around constantly has  contributed to the offensive failures this season without a doubt.  It's almost like a case study in how not to handle an NFL line.

I think the whole problem started with Rhule's talent evaluation of Erving and Elflein.  Here were two guy with poor recent performances that had bounced around the league.  Both of them had significant injury histories.  Yet Rhule signed them on the first day of free agency to relatively big contracts.   I think Rhule somehow believed he / his staff could "coach up" these guys and that they could be capable starters for the Panthers.  

Well the reality is that the pair were exactly what the entire NFL knew they were - not very good and injury prone.  Rhule thought he was being smarter than the rest of the league but he just showed how naive he was in the pro game.   And this was from a guy who coached the Giants OL !!   Did Rhule not learn anything from that experience.  

The cascade effect from the decision to sign Erving / Elflein meant that the team no longer felt pressure to go OL in the draft.   So they missed out on taking LT Rashawn Slater who went a few picks after ours and made the Pro Bowl his rookie season.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

It’s coaching. Miller, Scott, and Daley (at G) have looked decent in the past. Also looks like BC might be benched for Erving while MJ and Miller will be starting…

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/.amp/gm-report/carolina-panthers-release-depth-chart-vs-saints-12-29
 

The only think left interesting in this team was if BC can progress into a decent LT, but we might not even know this year… 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted

   They let Miller sit out there in FA for weeks. And a 27yo RG who has started 72 games in 6 years couldn’t  get an offer. So he had to take a league minimum, NON -guaranteed contract to play here. If they signed him to be a backup, that’s fine. But they put him right back in as starter. Listen to what the rest of the NFL was trying to tell you. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlitzMonster Mentor

BlitzMonster

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The only think left interesting in this team was if BC can progress into a decent LT, but we might not even know this year… 

That's the infuriating thing about Rhule.  It's a lost season so why not play the rookies ??   But he keeps trotting out the same bunch of vets for the OL that we already know are not good.  

For next year's planning you have to know what you've got with the current group of rookies.  

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

This is a great post !   Very good observation and thinking about the O-line.

I am also surprised at how bad our OL has played this season.  The moving players around constantly has  contributed to the offensive failures this season without a doubt.  It's almost like a case study in how not to handle an NFL line.

I think the whole problem started with Rhule's talent evaluation of Erving and Elflein.  Here were two guy with poor recent performances that had bounced around the league.  Both of them had significant injury histories.  Yet Rhule signed them on the first day of free agency to relatively big contracts.   I think Rhule somehow believed he / his staff could "coach up" these guys and that they could be capable starters for the Panthers.  

Well the reality is that the pair were exactly what the entire NFL knew they were - not very good and injury prone.  Rhule thought he was being smarter than the rest of the league but he just showed how naive he was in the pro game.   And this was from a guy who coached the Giants OL !!   Did Rhule not learn anything from that experience.  

The cascade effect from the decision to sign Erving / Elflein meant that the team no longer felt pressure to go OL in the draft.   So they missed out on taking LT Rashawn Slater who went a few picks after ours and made the Pro Bowl his rookie season.  

They also missed out on a no brainer in Trey Smith in the 6th. At least Rhule drafted his long snapping man crush Fletch instead.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BlitzMonster said:

That's the infuriating thing about Rhule.  It's a lost season so why not play the rookies ??   But he keeps trotting out the same bunch of vets for the OL that we already know are not good.  

For next year's planning you have to know what you've got with the current group of rookies.  

Deonte Brown needs to be playing one of the guard spots as well as BC at LT. It is painful to watch them get little to no opportunity to improve with a bunch of buster ass jimmies playing ahead of them. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Newbie said:

Deonte Brown needs to be playing one of the guard spots as well as BC at LT. It is painful to watch them get little to no opportunity to improve with a bunch of buster ass jimmies playing ahead of them. 

It’s all about Rhule trying to “win now” with the “rebuild” excuse still in his pocket. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s all about Rhule trying to “win now” with the “rebuild” excuse still in his pocket. 

That's actually a pretty good summary of it.

If we win, he takes credit. If we lose, "we're still rebuilding".

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Newbie said:

Deonte Brown needs to be playing one of the guard spots as well as BC at LT. It is painful to watch them get little to no opportunity to improve with a bunch of buster ass jimmies playing ahead of them. 

Imagine if we had Deonte Brown and Trey Smith in the interior for 4 years on rookie late round deals

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted

With a new OC and maybe new OL coach, even if Rhule stays, I'd expect an overhaul of the offense. We have to have a new scheme and maybe a new QB. I'd expect a revamped line but I'm not sure who would start on it besides Moton that is still on the roster. Rhule seemed to Love Michael Jordan at LG but his recent performance would indicate he's gone (at least by any reasonable HC).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Imagine if we had Deonte Brown and Trey Smith in the interior for 4 years on rookie late round deals

Of course we don’t know what we have in Brown yet but Trey looks great. Rhule is so arrogant he thought we were all set at OL and passed on a gift that fell in his lap for frigging Fletcher. We could’ve had Slater and Humphrey, two rookie Pro Bowlers over Horn and the invisible TMJ. Still picked BC as a LG or swing tackle and Brown and Smith in the 6th round. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...