Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade out of 6 or trade away a player instead?


Reebis21
 Share

If we wanted to acquire more pics, would you rather sacrifice #6 overall or a player on the roster?  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. If we wanted to acquire more pics, would you rather sacrifice #6 overall or a player on the roster?

    • #6
      21
    • Player on roster (Explain who you plan to trade)
      40


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Jesus fuging Christ people.  Due to their contracts there is literally no way we can trade either.  Why are you guys making this so hard?  They literally cannot be traded due to the cap hit. 

14 million with a potential out after next year for a team with deep playoff aspirations? Ya, I’m sure there could be a buyer for CMC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reebis21 said:

And it still blows my mind people will argue that we are stupid to want Tampa to win this week. In every year we r out of contention, so many self righteous fans will act like we aren’t panthers fans because we are rooting for a better draft pick at the end of the year. Blows my mind.

For us to get that lower pick is near impossible.  We need the Jets and giants both to win.   There is a post on here that breaks it down more.  Just like last week with the taints.  I would rather beat the succaneers and enjoy a win than care bout a draft.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

14 million with a potential out after next year for a team with deep playoff aspirations? Ya, I’m sure there could be a buyer for CMC. 

I think it's a possibility. I'm thinking Houston.  They need a face of franchise type cause Watson is ugly.  I think they roll with Mills for one year.  A third and fifth for CMC.  Trade down with Cleveland cause I think they ready to evict Baker from the stadium.  They get a new QB.  We get a top tier lineman and a second round pick.  Win win win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

For us to get that lower pick is near impossible.  We need the Jets and giants both to win.   There is a post on here that breaks it down more.  Just like last week with the taints.  I would rather beat the succaneers and enjoy a win than care bout a draft.  

Not only are we jeopardizing falling in the draft with a win, I don't Rhule to be able to hang his hat on anything. I don't want him to be able to say, "look we beat Tom Brady everything is ok". I hope we go out there on Sunday and get our cheeks clapped and it looks as embarrassing for Rhule as possible. It is time for him to go.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

I think it's a possibility. I'm thinking Houston.  They need a face of franchise type cause Watson is ugly.  I think they roll with Mills for one year.  A third and fifth for CMC.  Trade down with Cleveland cause I think they ready to evict Baker from the stadium.  They get a new QB.  We get a top tier lineman and a second round pick.  Win win win.  

I’m gunna have to respectfully disagree with ya here. I think the last thing a team like Houston should do, is trade for a high priced RB who has had back to back injury riddled seasons. They have holes everywhere on that team. They need those picks just as bad as we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To trade back you usually need a top heavy type of draft. This draft doesn't have the type of players you want to trade into the top 10 to draft. That means we are likely stuck at the 6th pick.

We need to prepare for next season as though CMC is not on the roster. We need a better RB than Hubbard, and that can be found in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/5/2022 at 11:44 AM, travisura said:

Package CMC and Robby for a 2nd and a 3rd. Gets rid of their contracts and gets us our middle round picks back bada bing bada boom. Now, to find someone willing to take on their contracts...

Anything less would be a travesty.. that’s just offing there contract … plus after the trade there deals will look below avg since we already paying most the contract …. In many worlds it makes sense for us if we have too .. but we have plenty of cap next… ton dead money coming off the books .. like to keep it that way … let cmac play rebuild his trade value 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...