Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on tackles and arm length


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Cliff notes

I didn’t watch the whole thing, but when talking about the line and arm length, he said it doesn’t matter that much if you have compensating factors like quickness, etc.  He mentioned the proper technique of keeping your arms/hands in front of you, which Brady does well.  Said he played well and had a tough season because he had to learn so many different positions, but he did it as a rookie and was impressed.  Sounded like he wants to keep him at LT.  
 

He also mentioned Deonte Brown and how you could see the power he brings, as well as quickness even with his size when he was in last night.  Saw him push his man around and get upfield.  He thinks Brown and BC will be good building blocks.  
 

HOWEVER, they should’ve gotten a shitload more playing time to see what we’ve got in these guys.  Now we have 3 games of BC at LT to figure out if we should draft one.  he didn’t say this but it’s clear it should’ve gone down that way.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Nah come on - be a man of your word

I am. I said I was done watching as long as Rhule is the Panthers coach. I didn't watch the last three games. Hell, why would anyone? Continuing to cheer on an incompetent organization doesn't make you a "good fan". It makes you a sucker. If Tepper cared enough and/or was competent enough, he's get rid of Rhule. He either doesn't care or he's incompetent. I hope he learns. Until he does, I'm not watching.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PandaMan said:

I didn’t watch the whole thing, but when talking about the line and arm length, he said it doesn’t matter that much if you have compensating factors like quickness, etc.  He mentioned the proper technique of keeping your arms/hands in front of you, which Brady does well.  Said he played well and had a tough season because he had to learn so many different positions, but he did it as a rookie and was impressed.  Sounded like he wants to keep him at LT.  
 

He also mentioned Deonte Brown and how you could see the power he brings, as well as quickness even with his size when he was in last night.  Saw him push his man around and get upfield.  He thinks Brown and BC will be good building blocks.  
 

HOWEVER, they should’ve gotten a shitload more playing time to see what we’ve got in these guys.  Now we have 3 games of BC at LT to figure out if we should draft one.  he didn’t say this but it’s clear it should’ve gone down that way.  

If Christensen is the LT, then #6 has to be QB or trade down IMO.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

“Was it a mistake to picks up Sam darnolds 5th year option before he played a down for you”

”well you look at it as 22 million over two years and….”

lol the logic hoops these guys will jump through to justify their poor decisions 

Better answer than fhules 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He signed on to be Rhule's yes man. I have no idea why people want that kind of GM to be turned lose like Rhule was. It's really desperate when we could do a lot better.

We went from interviewing Berry to the guy who is qualified to get him coffee and we are supposed to be happy with that? The only guy we interviewed with Rhule that was promising turned down the job and went back to the 49ers. He is a Rhule quality GM, that should be enough to not want him around. He constantly did a poor job but it's all on Rhule. I call BS 

I don't want the Gettlmen type GM either... I want the coach to be able person when it come to talent evaluation.. Rhule just sucked at it.. 

But Parcell says why cook the meal if you can't pick the groceries..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheProcess said:

I said the same thing recently in another thread. Having good feet, balance, and technique are more important for a Tackle. I even used Slater and Joe Thomas as examples

BC needs to work on his lower body over the offseason and anchor better vs. bull rushers.  However, finesse rushers are not that successful against him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...