Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Boy got a Photon Cannon..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Carson Strong NFL Scouting Report

Pros
  • Top tier arm strength
  • Displays great touch on downfield throws
  • Clean throwing motion
Cons
  • Ball placement in all areas
  • Major risk taker
  • His lack of mobility is constantly evident

Carson Strong is a three-year contributor for the Nevada Wolfpack. He possesses good height and solid weight for the quarterback position in the NFL. As mentioned previously, Strong should post one of the slowest 40 times at the NFL Combine. In 2021, Carson Strong led the Nevada Wolfpack to an 8-4 record and a spot in the Quicklane Bowl. He was able to record 4,186 yards for 36 touchdowns and just eight interceptions on the year. He was awarded Mountain West Offensive Player of the Year honors for the second time in his career.

The first thing that jumps off of Carson Strong’s film is his natural arm strength. Easily able to push the ball down the field, he can throw 65 yards with ease. While some believe this ability is overrated, it is still something the defense must respect. It also pops up in other areas as his velocity to all levels of the field is consistently great. This gives Strong the ability to put the ball into windows that other passers couldn’t even attempt. Strong may have the strongest arm in this draft class. Furthermore, he also displays good touch down the field making him an exciting deep passer. He does all of these things rather seamlessly as well as he couples them with a clean, easy throwing motion that allows him to get the ball out quickly.

However, while Strong does have a talented arm, he is not without flaws. To begin with, his ball placement is routinely off. This makes throws that should be easy completions far tougher and sometimes just incompletions. It also handicaps the offense as Strong’s inaccuracy limits the chances for a run after the catch. In addition to this, he has never seen a throw he didn’t think he could make. Of course, this works in his favor oftentimes in college as his arm can make it happen. In the NFL however, he will not get away with these passes as often. His lack of mobility could also present a problem. As NFL pass rushers become increasingly more athletic, a QB’s ability to escape becomes more and more prevalent, and Strong simply doesn’t have it.

Who wrote this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just don’t see it with Strong. The Nevada offense was perfect for him and he took full advantage.

His ability to go through his reads at a much faster pace with no mobility whatsoever is going to be a huge question mark.

If you watch majority of Strong’s games you’ll see him go with his first read because:

1. Nevada has a good offensive scheme that is tailored to the short passing game or one on one deep shots on the outside.

2. Strong has a great arm and can make every throw.

3. The level of competition was poor and many times Strong’s first read was open.

Strong was sacked 35 times this past year which puts him in the bottom fourth of the NCAA in sacks. Some of that is due to Nevada’s offensive line which is in the middle of pack in the Mountain West, but a lot of times it’s because Strong is holding on to the ball too long when his first quick route isn’t available. Because his mobility is limited it puts him at a pretty big disadvantage.

If you want to see what Strong will look like in the NFL then just watch Ben Roethlisberger from this past year.

Strong will make some great throws but his athleticism and inability to come off his first read as soon as it’s not there will be a hinderance in the NFL where you only have three seconds to throw the football.

You can put on Josh Allen’s college tape and just see the difference in how a top tier QB processes his reads and uses his legs to extend plays so that he can go through all of his reads.

If you have to take a QB this year then you take Howell because over the past three years he’s shown he can do everything. It’s more about putting it all together at one time.

If you have the luxury of taking a QB and letting him sit (teams like Washington, Philadelphia, Minnesota, Miami, Denver, and Detroit) then you take a risk on Willis because he is the true boom or bust QB in the class.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

A few games showing all his throws.. Good and bad decisions.. Good and bad throws..

He is a gun slinger and has alot of faith in his arm.. Not athletic at all.. But he is making pre snap reads moving his WR and making audibles without looking for sideline playcards...  Stand strong in the pocket..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Just don’t see it with Strong. The Nevada offense was perfect for him and he took full advantage.

His ability to go through his reads at a much faster pace with no mobility whatsoever is going to be a huge question mark.

If you watch majority of Strong’s games you’ll see him go with his first read because:

1. Nevada has a good offensive scheme that is tailored to the short passing game or one on one deep shots on the outside.

2. Strong has a great arm and can make every throw.

3. The level of competition was poor and many times Strong’s first read was open.

Strong was sacked 35 times this past year which puts him in the bottom fourth of the NCAA in sacks. Some of that is due to Nevada’s offensive line which is in the middle of pack in the Mountain West, but a lot of times it’s because Strong is holding on to the ball too long when his first quick route isn’t available. Because his mobility is limited it puts him at a pretty big disadvantage.

If you want to see what Strong will look like in the NFL then just watch Ben Roethlisberger from this past year.

Strong will make some great throws but his athleticism and inability to come off his first read as soon as it’s not there will be a hinderance in the NFL where you only have three seconds to throw the football.

You can put on Josh Allen’s college tape and just see the difference in how a top tier QB processes his reads and uses his legs to extend plays so that he can go through all of his reads.

If you have to take a QB this year then you take Howell because over the past three years he’s shown he can do everything. It’s more about putting it all together at one time.

If you have the luxury of taking a QB and letting him sit (teams like Washington, Philadelphia, Minnesota, Miami, Denver, and Detroit) then you take a risk on Willis because he is the true boom or bust QB in the class.

It depends on what type of development QB you want.. 

The Tall statue (matt Ryan) or the Athlete with running ability (Lamar Jackson)..

I think both Strong and Wills will end up in the 2nd round.. Due to their flaws.. Strong (no athleticism) Malik (raw as hell)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

It depends on what type of development QB you want.. 

The Tall statue (matt Ryan) or the Athlete with running ability (Lamar Jackson)..

I think both Strong and Wills will end up in the 2nd round.. Due to their flaws.. Strong (no athleticism) Malik (raw as hell)..

For us in particular I don’t think either is a good option.

Both Howell and Pickett seem like better fits.

Howell has shown that he can do it all, now he just needs to do it all at one time. Pickett on the other hand could be a late boomer or he could have taken advantage of being the most experienced player in the ACC. Regardless, both can start right away. I just don’t think either is going to be a top 10 QB at anytime in this league.

Willis and Strong probably both need to sit for different reasons.

Also, Strong very well could have a great career. Eli Manning did and he’s as unathletic as they come. You just have to wonder about Strong’s ability to process a defense with his lack of athleticism to by him time. The game will move much quicker in the NFL than it does in the Mountain West. I think a good example is watching his tape against Kansas State. He had a decent game but the game moved much quicker for him and he doesn’t have the athleticism to make up for it. Then you watch Willis play Virginia Tech and you see that he’s raw and erratic but he’s so athletic that he can make up for it even playing at a high level. Pro’s and cons to both if those guys but both need to sit.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to see any young mans NFL dream get dashed by being drafted here in this lame duck season. Imagine if you spent your whole life working to be an NFL QB and it all comes crashing down when a dumbfug head coach like Matt Rhule drafts you and puts you behind Pat Elfein. Then fires your OC to save his fat ass 2 days before game day. Just a Greek Tragedy.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

For us in particular I don’t think either is a good option.

Both Howell and Pickett seem like better fits.

Howell has shown that he can do it all, now he just needs to do it all at one time. Pickett on the other hand could be a late boomer or he could have taken advantage of being the most experienced player in the ACC. Regardless, both can start right away. I just don’t think either is going to be a top 10 QB at anytime in this league.

Willis and Strong probably both need to sit for different reasons.

Also, Strong very well could have a great career. Eli Manning did and he’s as unathletic as they come. You just have to wonder about Strong’s ability to process a defense with his lack of athleticism to by him time. The game will move much quicker in the NFL than it does in the Mountain West. I think a good example is watching his tape against Kansas State. He had a decent game but the game moved much quicker for him and he doesn’t have the athleticism to make up for it. Then you watch Willis play Virginia Tech and you see that he’s raw and erratic but he’s so athletic that he can make up for it even playing at a high level. Pro’s and cons to both if those guys but both need to sit.

Jmo opinion I fuging hate Pickett as a prospect.. I hate he only had 1 good season of college football in 5 years.. I hate he's older prospect and I hate he isn't elite in anything.. Avg. Arm talent okay athleticism took him 5 years to be a good decisions maker .. I see Joey Harrington, Christian Ponder written all over him...

Now Howell maybe most talented QB in this draft.. I really feel he will rise during the draft process and it will come down to either picking him or a elite Olinemen in the 1st.  And I'm all Olinemen in the 1st no matter the position.. But Howell has a strong arm can run and has good college production every year in college..(unlike Pickett) .. He is a less athletic Russell Wilson  because he doesn't have ideal size... But he checks the box every where else.. And I'm not a UNC fan.. He just going to rise beyond where I'm comfortable picking him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Jmo opinion I fuging hate Pickett as a prospect.. I hate he only had 1 good season of college football in 5 years.. I hate he's older prospect and I hate he isn't elite in anything.. Avg. Arm talent okay athleticism took him 5 years to be a good decisions maker .. I see Joey Harrington, Christian Ponder written all over him...

Now Howell maybe most talented QB in this draft.. I really feel he will rise during the draft process and it will come down to either picking him or a elite Olinemen in the 1st.  And I'm all Olinemen in the 1st no matter the position.. But Howell has a strong arm can run and has good college production every year in college..(unlike Pickett) .. He is a less athletic Russell Wilson  because he doesn't have ideal size... But he checks the box every where else.. And I'm not a UNC fan.. He just going to rise beyond where I'm comfortable picking him...

I’m not a fan of Pickett either but I can understand to a point why some people are. Whoever drafts him is essentially hoping that he had a Joe Burrow glow up. The issue is that Burrow beat about 7 nationally ranked teams and set all sorts of records on the way to a National Championship. Pickett on the other hand beat up on a poor ACC.

I do like Howell. For me it all comes back to him being able to put everything together. His first two years he was one of the top passers of the football while not having much of a presence in the run game. This past year he struggled throwing the ball a bit but he was phenomenal on the ground. Can he put two and two together and become a Russell Wilsonesque QB?

The big question for Howell is can he be a franchise QB. A franchise QB might have been able to get a little more out of UNC last year. I get that he lost a ton of production but if he’s drafted high he isn’t going to be in a field of sunshine and daisy’s… it’ll be a pit of hellfire and brimstone. 

If we’re looking at a QB, I’d probably trade down between 12-15 and take Howell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’m not a fan of Pickett either but I can understand to a point why some people are. Whoever drafts him is essentially hoping that he had a Joe Burrow glow up. The issue is that Burrow beat about 7 nationally ranked teams and set all sorts of records on the way to a National Championship. Pickett on the other hand beat up on a poor ACC.

I do like Howell. For me it all comes back to him being able to put everything together. His first two years he was one of the top passers of the football while not having much of a presence in the run game. This past year he struggled throwing the ball a bit but he was phenomenal on the ground. Can he put two and two together and become a Russell Wilsonesque QB?

The big question for Howell is can he be a franchise QB. A franchise QB might have been able to get a little more out of UNC last year. I get that he lost a ton of production but if he’s drafted high he isn’t going to be in a field of sunshine and daisy’s… it’ll be a pit of hellfire and brimstone. 

If we’re looking at a QB, I’d probably trade down between 12-15 and take Howell. 

Ppl keep using Burrows as a template without context for Pickett...

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/joe-burrow-1.html

Burrows barely got a shot to play at Ohio state transferred and only had 2 season to show his ability.. 1 season to learn the system and then 1 of the best college seasons in history..

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/kenny-pickett-1.html

Pickett had 3 years as the unquestioned starter and it took him a 4th season to become a draftable player...

Not the same situation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, WOW!! said:

 

I see Mac Jones with a way better arm.. He is a throw back not much of a runner.. But hes big can add weight to his frame..

Out of all the QBS in this draft his video shows the most NFL throws.. Putting laser between 2 or 3 defenders, beating tight coverage, showing touch and different ball speeds, dropping dimes in a bucket. Plus he gets the ball out quick and makes good decisions when doing it... His arm shows it all.. I wouldn't be mad if we get a 2nd round pick and get him...

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/carson-strong-1.html

This is the progression you want to see when picking a QB.. Every year he get better.. That's The Parcell qb evaluation chart..

I agree he has a pretty good arm but its a bit of a stretch to say he has most NFL throws out of all all the prospects based on a highlight video.

According to this:

2022 NFL Mock Draft: Carolina Panthers select QB Sam Howell at No. 6, New Orleans Saints land Ole Miss QB Matt Corral at No. 16 | NFL Draft | PFF

Howell actually leads all of the QBs for most big time throws over the last 3 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I agree he has a pretty good arm but its a bit of a stretch to say he has most NFL throws out of all all the prospects based on a highlight video.

According to this:

2022 NFL Mock Draft: Carolina Panthers select QB Sam Howell at No. 6, New Orleans Saints land Ole Miss QB Matt Corral at No. 16 | NFL Draft | PFF

Howell actually leads all of the QBs for most big time throws over the last 3 years.

 

3 years okay you are probably right.. But in 2021 nooo.. Carson was making more NFL throws then Howell and that could basically because Howell was running and doing more QB design runs this year...

I think Howell is the better prospect he can move and has a really talented arm as well..

I made a Carson thread because he will most likely end up a second round pick based on no athleticism.. So if we can recoup some picks.. We could possibly get a starting Olinemen in the 1st round and get Carson or Wills in the 2nd.. 

I think Howell will move into top 15 pick in the draft Process and prevent us from getting 1 of the best Olinemen in the 1st..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
×
×
  • Create New...