Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is Rhule going to give up for Jimmy G?


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I know Rhule was desperate for a QB after the Watson thing flopped but fug, he could have gotten Andy Dalton in FA and got better play. Didn't have to trade picks for him and take his 5th year bonus.

Yeah, there were several QBs that were available that wouldn't have cost the Panthers a single draft pick, many that had better records than Sam.

Baffling that Rhule would sign off on trading for a QB that was worse than just about any other available in free agency.  Is it possible none of the alternatives would consider Carolina or is Rhule simply that bad of a judge when it comes to QBs?

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Teddy was a Hurney, Brady boy.. That's why it was so easy to let him go.. They won't do the same with Sam.. You can see how they still cover up for Sam in interview... They trashed Teddy before the season was over last year...

I think they just got plain pissed off when Teddy threw the staff under the bus. They have to know they have no chance at getting a fourth year of they roll with Darnold again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think they just got plain pissed off when Teddy threw the staff under the bus. They have to know they have no chance at getting a fourth year of they roll with Darnold again.

Yeah I hope so to but if they can't get a Watson or Cousins.. Imo they will stick with Sam and Cam  and Draft a young QB in the draft.. Again they aren't totally trashing Sam they aren't saying they will commit to him but they aren't trashing him like everybody in the organization did to Teddy...

Hopefully it comes down to what Mcadoo wants and Rhule and Tepper let him do the offensive evaluation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Yeah I hope so to but if they can't get a Watson or Cousins.. Imo they will stick with Sam and Cam  and Draft a young QB in the draft.. Again they aren't totally trashing Sam they aren't saying they will commit to him but they aren't trashing him like everybody in the organization did to Teddy...

Hopefully it comes down to what Mcadoo wants and Rhule and Tepper let him do the offensive evaluation..

Chances are Teddy would've still been on the team if he hadn't called out the coaches for their incompetence.  TB was far from perfect, but he was miles better than Sammy (who we are apparently keeping).

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Chances are Teddy would've still been on the team if he hadn't called out the coaches for their incompetence.  TB was far from perfect, but he was miles better than Sammy (who we are apparently keeping).

Or if he ran the plays they told him to.. But whatever happened it went all the way to the top because even Tepper was shitting on Teddy.. So he pissed alot of ppl off with whatever he did..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Chances are Teddy would've still been on the team if he hadn't called out the coaches for their incompetence.  TB was far from perfect, but he was miles better than Sammy (who we are apparently keeping).

Fwiw, I think with Teddy, we probably win two to three more games this past year.  Of course, some here would consider that a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't think of a team with a worse QB room than ours.  I really can't.

In terms of drafting a QB this year, I'm for it . . . except that there is no one here for him to learn from.  Darnold?  PJ?  These are the guys we want to see helping a rookie learn?  Yikes.

As far as Jimmy G goes, there is no way we can get him with sacrificing our future completely.  SF is in the drivers seat.  JG's contract next year is NOT guaranteed.  They can cut him and his 24 million dollars with only 1.4 million in dead cap to show for it.  Sam's contract is fully guaranteed.  We all know that the only way we bring in an NFL starting QB of any stripe is by making Sam part of the deal.  That 18 million has to go.  I don't see how you trade 24 million non-guaranteed for 18 million guaranteed with some sort of make weight coming from our side.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...