Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albright: Panthers circling on Pickett


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Verge said:

This was my last prediction 

xsPafp.jpg

I had 
Sewell > Horn > Waddle as our options 

vdRFu7.jpg

When Mac dropped I thought they would go him because of the hype he got from a few different people, that was incorrect. 

In retrospect we maybe should have taken Mac.  Good call on Horn and if Sewell was there is was probably the pick

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

So people like Igo, me, and Norris say it happened, and then Marty Hurney says it happened, but that is just fake? I guess I am not following the logic. He literally tells you he tried to move up for Greg Little. He would have drafted Greg Little at 16 if Burns was not there. 

I just have to say that's astounding. You actually limped into this with that as a "source". A phrase that's repeated year in and out by scouts, managers, commentators. Every single draft we hear the phrase "first round talent", often a hundred times just from the commentary of the second round.

This is so disgusing that you're trying to argue this as a source. No wonder you're so far off the mark. You're reading tea leaves, and using it as facts.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

In retrospect we maybe should have taken Mac.  Good call on Horn and if Sewell was there is was probably the pick

Don't forget the Waddle prediction.

So it's Mac, then Waddle, then maybe Horn (like all the rest of the media was idicating for weeks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I just have to say that's astounding. You actually limped into this with that as a "source". A phrase that's repeated year in and out by scouts, managers, commentators. Every single draft we hear the phrase "first round talent", often a hudren times just from the commentary of the second round.

This is so disgustly that your'e trying to argue this as a source. No wonder you're so far off the mark. You're reading tea leaves, and using it as facts.

Ok dude whatever you say.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On a side note, we heard from Rhule about why he didnt take slater but I would love to know how in the holy fug they fuged up the Parsons evaluation that badly?   Lack of tape?

It baffles me that Panthers fans suddenly want to spend more 1st round picks on LBs. We probably have the strongest history at 4-3 LBs of any team in the league since our inception and that's paved the way to an overall losing record and investing far too many resources into lower value positions is a big reason why.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me that Panthers fans suddenly want to spend more 1st round picks on LBs. We probably have the strongest history at 4-3 LBs of any team in the league since our inception and that's paved the way to an overall losing record and investing far too many resources into lower value positions is a big reason why.

I would go Slater-Parsons-Horn in the last draft (assuming we had ruled out a qb)

 

I dont prefer MLB over tackles but that dude is special.  I would be damn sure happier now knowing we had Parsons on the roster instead of Horn.  But thats just me

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the coach and staff that is overly obsessed with metrics and a few inches or pounds...is going to completely ignore one of the biggest and most important metrics in football?

If we take Pickett, they should announce the pick and announce the firing of Rhule at the same time.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I would go Slater-Parsons-Horn in the last draft (assuming we had ruled out a qb)

 

I dont prefer MLB over tackles but that dude is special.  I would be damn sure happier now knowing we had Parsons on the roster instead of Horn.  But thats just me

I can't complain too much about Horn. He looked legit before the injury and CB >>>>> off ball LB all day everyday. It's just that pick absolutely should've been between Fields and Slater IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Krovvy said:

Okay, so the trade would amount to trading up half of the second round. That is, if the rumor is accurate.

Some would say that's an okay gamble for a team without a quarterback. Especially considering most of this fanbase was okay with trading a second, fourth, and sixth for Darnold, and then argued it's fine we're taking his fifth year option.

So, the rumor of Hurney trying to trade next year's first to move back into the first in 2010 has been debunked. I know it's a huddle favorite, but it never made sense, and never had any sourced backing.

Aaahhh, no.

You suggested we didn't attempt to trade with anyone. That was proven wrong.

Then you said, "oh the rumor was that we tried to trade back into the first round". No it wasn't.

The story  was that we attempted to trade up to get Clausen, which we did. And unlike your characterization of it being just a few spots, it would have been a pretty significant jump.

As to whether people suggested we tried to trade next year's first rounder? Nobody knows for certain what was offered other than that the Rams asked for more than we were willing to give up.

Could it have included next year's first? Given that Marty had already done that twice, yes it's possible.

I get that you're trying to spend this so that you can still say you were right.

You weren't, and youve neither proven nor "debunked" anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

So the coach and staff that is overly obsessed with metrics and a few inches or pounds...is going to completely ignore one of the biggest and most important metrics in football?

If we take Pickett, they should announce the pick and announce the firing of Rhule at the same time.

Rhule will say whatever to fit his agenda. He should not be an nfl coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

I'm still waiting for a source on that too.

You guys will be blaming Hurney a decade from now. Meanwhile we're in a death spiral as a franchise.

Hurney flat out told reporters that he was considering a move up into round 1 to take Greg Little.  I distinctly remember that

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Hurney flat out told reporters that he was considering a move up into round 1 to take Greg Little.

You remember correctly.

As it turns out, Hurney and the Panthers were trying to move up to get Little much earlier in the draft. Speaking in an interview with Sirius XM NFL Radio, Hurney talked about Little. He says they were trying to trade up to get him as early as the No. 21 overall pick in the first round. 

USA Today Panthers Wire

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...