Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FA QB Options


Michael G
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://catcrave.com/2022/02/16/7-quarterbacks-carolina-panthers-target-2022-free-agency/3/

This Fansided (Catcrave) Article discusses 7 possible FA QBs that could be brought in to compete with Darnold. Let's assume we won't draft a young signal caller and we can't bag another more established signal caller via Trade.

The Players Mentioned were

1. Jacoby Brissette

2. Marcus Mariota

3. Jameis W.

4. Tyrod Taylor

5. Mike White

6. Mitch Turbisky

7. Brandon Allen

Which of these guys has the best shot of helping this team win some games. Explain your reasoning if you please and debate away. (Cam is not on this list but feel free to add him. I can't stop you!)

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would probably take Mitch if we found a way to trade Darnold. Besides that really no point. None of those are gonna move the needle, rather getting us another 8-6th pick; missing out on the most highly regarded QB’s next year.

Edited by shaq
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best shot? Eh....depends on how we build and how we run the offense.

Taylor/Brissett will not actively lose you games and will manage them relatively effectively. 

Winston/Trubisky are gambles on gunslingers. Gonna have some high highs and low lows. 

If you go deep passing offense:

1. Winston

2. Trubisky

If you go conservative, rush based offense:

1. Taylor

2. Brissett

 

Not interested at all in the rest other than for backup purposes.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mitch signed with Buffalo because he wanted a stable situation to regroup. I highly doubt he's going to jump right back into another full blown poo show.

The writer seem to suggests a lot of these FAs would be intrigued because they are assured a shot to start going up against Darnold. I guess Mitch would have to decide if starting again is worth the risks of getting caught up in the Mess here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mitch signed with Buffalo because he wanted a stable situation to regroup. I highly doubt he's going to jump right back into another full blown poo show.

Right, he'd rather be a backup on a playoff team and maybe get his Nick Foles moment at some point in the playoffs. Then get his one decent contract wherever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, parker said:

Doesn't he have consistent injury problems?

Mariota hasn't really played much the last couple of years. He did have some injury issues at Tennessee. If He's gotten better watching and learning he should be healed up. He might be worth a look. I guess injury is always a possibility though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ultimately it's up to the other safety prospects to clearly outplay Scott. I think when that happens on tape against other teams it'll be addressed. I think none of them have done that definitively and consistently yet. 
    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
×
×
  • Create New...