Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Rhule spoke to Charlotte reporters

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

Jimmy G is a player who is constantly being given credit for stuff he didn’t do. 
He didn’t lead the 49ers to the Super Bowl their defense did. He lost them the Super Bowl. 
He threw 75 yards in the NFC championship game and his deficiencies were known due to the heavy amount of running. 49ers even back then knew they couldn’t put the team on his back and hope to win. 
Some stupid team will overpay. I hope to god it isn’t us. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
53 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I guess but would you have been more upset if he said BC is our LT this year meaning that we have no desire to take any of the top 3 LTs if they are there?

I'm fully prepared to watch us take a quarterback even if they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

Oddly enough, I would have thought “getting the staff right” should have been a primary emphasis of his FIRST offseason prior to his FIRST season.

But thats just me.

I'd like to think that would have started with the head coach.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So our IOL is a total question mark and all of our RB's are under 205 pounds so we're going to run down the middle now? Mcadoo off to a good start already

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Michael G said:

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

It's being hinted that McAdoo wants big road graders.

We don't exactly have a lot of guys who fit that profile right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Michael G said:

Agreed- I'm hoping they work hard to change the IOL and add a big back if this is the new philosophy. 

If we go into the season with Eiflein as our starting Center, we are fuged. 

Whoever starts instead of Miller is addition by subtraction. The fact he started as much as he did baffles me...

Jesus I'm getting upset again thinking about how stupid the OL was managed all season. It made no damn sense whatsoever and reminds me of how little hope I have going into next season. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted

Sounds like we might be moving away from the WCO base (haven't looked at McAdoo's past philosophy)

I remember the Giant Offense being kinda WC-like under Macadoo. I guess he's moving away from that philosophy. They used the shotgun a lot, but still threw a lot short passes. He had Eli throw a bunch of screens. I read somewhere that they were a zone blocking scheme like what we currently use so I wonder if (based on what Rhule said) we are going to go more Gap/Power...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

WCO is what Brady ran (influenced by Sean Payton)

My understanding was Peyton stole form every single system and formed his "own". He did change it up lots once Drew got older. Basically Payton did what smart coaches do, wonder why thats soooo hard to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billy Love Mentor

Billy Love

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, jackson113 said:

 

 

I’d like to see evidence of “football intelligence” from Matt Rhule. That seems to be a BUZZ word of his. Preaches that his players and coaches need to be tough, accountable with great football intelligence…yet he has not shown that he processes any of these characteristics himself. He is full of sh!t, a very successful bulls!t artist, but full of sh!t none the less. 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

I’d like to see evidence of “football intelligence” from Matt Rhule. That seems to be a BUZZ word of his. Preaches that his players and coaches need to be tough, accountable with great football intelligence…yet he has not shown that he processes any of these characteristics himself. He is full of sh!t, a very successful bulls!t artist, but full of sh!t none the less. 

His father was a preacher and hes read lots of "How to be supreme leader" type books.  

His QB decisions saying I look forward to Cam-then cutting him, picking Teddy dishwater and paying him 30+ million for one year, Picking Sam Darnold, passing on fields and Jones, bringing back Cam just to embarrass him, looking into Jimmy/Kirk "IR meh with great talent/coach" G/Cousins, having Walker on the 53 roster......soooo much fail and I know I missed some points 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Basbear said:

My understanding was Peyton stole form every single system and formed his "own". He did change it up lots once Drew got older. Basically Payton did what smart coaches do, wonder why thats soooo hard to do?

All coaches do that to some level, but some are better at it than others.

Payton used primarily WCO concepts in his play design. His particular spin included a lot of natural picks. They concentrated on consistency more so than big plays, and he found the perfect quarterback to run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...