Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pats have discussed a trade for Robby Anderson with the Panthers at the combine...


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, frankw said:

If you're defending Fitterer you aren't helping him with comparisons like this. We could have hired anyone to be a yes man even a huddler here.

Not defending, simply stating the football ops structure.  You don't give a NFL novice HC control over full roster decisions and hire a GM with deference to said newbie HC.  You're correct, at that point the GM is a "yes man" to a large degree.  I doubt Rhule had his final say powers stripped by Tepper, but knowing he's on a short leash, Rhule had better make this a true collective effort.  I mean, If Rhule and staff are canned at the end of the season, Fitt could make a case for staying as Tepper knows full and well he neutered the GM position by giving Rhule full roster control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Not defending, simply stating the football ops structure.  You don't give a NFL novice HC control over full roster decisions and hire a GM with deference to said newbie HC.  You're correct, at that point the GM is a "yes man" to a large degree.  I doubt Rhule had his final say powers stripped by Tepper, but knowing he's on a short leash, Rhule had better make this a true collective effort.  I mean, If Rhule and staff are canned at the end of the season, Fitt could make a case for staying as Tepper knows full and well he neutered the GM position by giving Rhule full roster control.

Oh we agree Rhule should never have been given final say. But at the same time if none of this works out there are plenty of other GM candidates out there we can interview who are not interested in just being a yes man. And let's just be plain about this. There are things that could have and should have been said about that Darnold deal before it all went down and anyone who didn't speak up honestly shouldn't be in charge of a lemonade stand.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, frankw said:

After all the years of you and others rightfully blasting Marty Hurney into oblivion for his mismanagement it is tough to watch the mental gymnastics now just because you like the new GM on a personal level. None of that can change the fact he was directly involved in the Sam Darnold trade which will go down as one of the worst in years for any team. These guys are paid the big bucks to evaluate talent.

I neither like nor dislike Fitt, the jury is still out for me.  The structure he walk into put him behind the eight ball is all I am stating. 

Simply put, this is like a company that moved on from it's long time head executive.  They promote some young, mid-management guy to lead the company with a super-thin resume, but the board likes his moxie.  To help the guy along they bring a guy in from another company who was a former CEO to wet nurse the newbie, but tells him "look, help the new CEO along, but all final decisions are his."  Does that sound like a favorable situation to be in? 

When Hurney was canned, I don't remember candidates busting down Tepper's door for the opportunity to be the GM here.  Why?  The Panthers weren't a complete joke...yet.  Why would people be hesitant to take a NFL GM job?  Why did they conveniently make an offer to the one candidate that worked under the same football ops structure in Seattle (HC with full roster control)?

While Fitt is not blameless in all this, Rhule is the ringleader of this poo show and it reflects on the whole organization.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, frankw said:

After all the years of you and others rightfully blasting Marty Hurney into oblivion for his mismanagement it is tough to watch the mental gymnastics now just because you like the new GM on a personal level. None of that can change the fact he was directly involved in the Sam Darnold trade which will go down as one of the worst in years for any team. These guys are paid the big bucks to evaluate talent.

Hurney Derangement Syndrome. As long as it's not Hurney it's good and to be defended no matter what. These people still think Gettleman was brilliant. 😆

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

At this point we don’t really know how much say Fitt had. I just think QB and OL were such big misses in FA and draft that I don’t see any signs that Fitt did anything good. I mean if you can’t sway Rhule to take Smith over a long snapper that’s a problem because you believe that Erving and Elflein were solutions, Brown was worth being a project and that OL is no big deal or your balls are so small that you won’t even argue your point.

We also still have the Thomas deal which was done after Rhule was supposedly neutered. Where’s our salary cap guru in all this as well?

Again, if you saw the draft video, Fitt was facilitating the trades, making sure the value was there and Rhule was the trigger man.  Rhule let his WIFE make a pick for crying out loud.  Apparently Rhule had a bro-mance with the LS at the Senior Bowl. That was another 100% Rhule pick.  Do you think Fitt was going to be like, "Matt, fug your wife's choice and your LS crush from the Senior Bowl"?

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Eh, it’s not that bad. If they get rid of Agholor they save $5M in cap and $10M in real cash in 2022. That means without finagling Anderson’s contract, they would have $8M more cap hit and $3M more real cash hit in 2022. Robby with Sam was still better than Agholor. If they feel Robby can be 2020 Robby, those 2022 increases are more than worth it.

Pay 3-8M more for a player in Anderson who produced 46 more yards in 46 more targets? And give up draft picks to do that? I don’t see that happening. With 8M of RAs base salary guaranteed, he could starting pouting again and they would be on the hook for that if they wanted to let him go. Agholor was every bit as good last year and in 2020. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

After all the years of you and others rightfully blasting Marty Hurney into oblivion for his mismanagement it is tough to watch the mental gymnastics now just because you like the new GM on a personal level. None of that can change the fact he was directly involved in the Sam Darnold trade which will go down as one of the worst in years for any team. These guys are paid the big bucks to evaluate talent.

Marty had final say on the roster.

As far as "a personal level" I don't know jack about Fitterer. What I do know is he has over 20 years of scouting experience. Marty had exactly zero.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Marty had final say on the roster.

As far as "a personal level" I don't know jack about Fitterer. What I do know is he has over 20 years of scouting experience. Marty had exactly zero.

Fair point. But that experience does not always equate to success. Dave Gettleman had scouting experience dating back to mid eighties and he was still fired from two GM positions with the second one definitely not going well at all. Just a few bad decisions can sink a ship that's the business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Fair point. But that experience does not always equate to success. Dave Gettleman had scouting experience dating back to mid eighties and he was still fired from two GM positions with the second one definitely not going well at all. Just a few bad decisions can sink a ship that's the business.

Pairing has a lot to do with it.

Rivera-Gettleman worked. Rivera-Hurney didn't. Neither did Fox-Hurney, Rhule-Hurney or Pretty Much Anybody-Hurney.

Wouldn't bet on seeing any successful pairings with Matt Rhule either, at least not at the pro level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Cmon NE please take him!

NE is missing a 5th rounder and 7th rounder.  I doubt they give up their 3rd or 4th straight up for Robby and shorten their draft even further.  Maybe we get their 3rd and they get Robby and one of our 5th rounders?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pairing has a lot to do with it.

Rivera-Gettleman worked. Rivera-Hurney didn't. Neither did Fox-Hurney, Rhule-Hurney or Pretty Much Anybody-Hurney.

Wouldn't bet on seeing any successful pairings with Matt Rhule either, at least not at the pro level.

Valid. But in relation to DG you could argue it did and then it didn't. The unraveling of a Super Bowl team began with the 2016 offseason and man did we blow it and Dave was the biggest part of that personnel wise. On the coaching end I don't think enough can be said about the loss of McDermott and Ron hiring and promoting his pals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Valid. But in relation to DG you could argue it did and then it didn't. The unraveling of a Super Bowl team began with the 2016 offseason and man did we blow it and Dave was the biggest part of that personnel wise. On the coaching end I don't think enough can be said about the loss of McDermott and Ron hiring and promoting his pals.

Things were on the upswing in 2017 when he was fired. Of course that was a Richardson move so he could bring Marty back, so 😕

As far as the Giants, neither Gettleman-Shurmur nor Gettleman-Judge produced anything much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...