Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Adding a people element to this, if the meeting with us was Rhule and Tepper, and the meeting with NO was Dennis Allen and Mickey Loomis....  if you were watson wouldnt you kinda be pissed that the owner of the saints didnt come? lightly disrpecting, considering why he wants to leave the texans in the first place

Screw the Saints, but I think people are overplaying this.  Gayle is the owner because her husband died, I doubt she would have added much of anything to the conversation and she likely has bigger things to handle.  And Mickey Loomis has been the GM of the Saints since 2002.  There is probably nobody more important in the front office than him.  

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mage said:

Screw the Saints, but I think people are overplaying this.  Gayle is the owner because her husband died, I doubt she would have added much of anything to the conversation and she likely has bigger things to handle.  And Mickey Loomis has been the GM of the Saints since 2002.  There is probably nobody more important in the front office than him.  

It’s like…the two things that brought them stability in 2006 are no longer there…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good news is that we are pretty uniquely well established to address all of our needs this season. We have $14m real cap space, and something like $40m in trade deadline cap space. Not sure exactly how that works out. But, we have the room to absorb any bad contracts. With recent rule changes regarding retention, that went into effect this season, we now have a huge advantage in the trade market.  On top of that, while we do have obvious needs, we also have a glut of talent in certain areas that we struggle to find ice time for. We are over-stocked on scrappy talented lil-guys, strong defensively sound 3rd liners and shutdown left shot dmen. Whether it's a package or separate deals, idk. But, one of each from Stank/Blake/Nads, Erob/Carrier/KK/Jank, and Walker/Nystrom; throw in some 1st round picks (and frankly any other prospects they want) and we should be able to come out with a 1b to pair with Bussi and either a 2c with size or a 2c and size.   TL/DR We got the money, you got the stuff?
    • I don’t  think 6’4 was ever considered small or undersized. Baby hands tho, yes that was his thing That’s an interesting idea, like an optical illusion? Sounds like you have personal experience with this! 
    • in the 25' draft the Carolina Panthers had hired Brandt Tillis someone who actually understood how to build a successful team & build through the draft .  this team was yes mismanaged for years prior to Brandt Tillis joining the team in 25' & rarely done anything right in the draft outside occaionaly getting lucky on an UDFA such as Jalen Coker who's dad coincidentally happened to be a huge Carolina Panthers fan, hint hint  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...