Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love


Biggdaddi1022
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

Yeah he would. No one is trading significant assets for a player on the last year of his deal unless they can agree to terms on an extension. If Lamar isn't willing to negotiate an extension, trade dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It would happen this year most likely, especially if the ravens are unable to extend him. It’s too risky going into the off-season , they could Franchise tag him, but he would be cheaper for competing teams to acquire him. They would only have to give up 2 1sts at max if was franchise tagged.

 

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

I would trade 6 and next years first in a second for him if he extends his contract with us.  He isn’t perfect but I wouldn’t miss a snap watching this team with that dude.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It blowsy mind folks can't see this. Classic example of the reality that QBs usually get more credit than they deserve when the team is doing well and more blame than they deserve when the team isn't doing well. Jimmy G is and was trash carried by a good team.

Foles... nah, he isn't good but that dude did capture lightning in a bottle during that run. He was a big reason why they won the SB. In the NFC CG and SB he threw for a combined 700+ yards and 6 TDs vs. only 1 INT whole completing roughly 70% of his attempts. That's ELITE play if only for a very brief yet pivotal period.

What I meant by that statement was because of that game teams looked at Foles differently and thought he was a franchise QB suddenly despite being a back up for years and, like you said, caught lightning in a bottle. 

His regression started the year after, he wasn’t nearly as good the season after the Super Bowl as he was during that magical stretch. Then he was given a big contract by the Jags and he got injured, came back and played very poorly

Yes, he was amazing during that Super Bowl run, but teams saw a Super Bowl and thought he turned a corner and was now an elite QB. Instead of looking at the perfect situation Foles was in. 

 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He fuging sucks, and at that price, did we not learn our lesson with Teddy or Darnold?  My God.  Just please stop.  Spend those picks on a mid-round rookie in the draft and you're still probably going to end up with a better player than Teddy, Darnold, or Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It would happen this year most likely, especially if the ravens are unable to extend him. It’s too risky going into the off-season , they could Franchise tag him, but he would be cheaper for competing teams to acquire him. They would only have to give up 2 1sts at max if was franchise tagged.

 

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

Fitty…

Make It So Star Trek GIF
 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...