Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyler Murray?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, PootieNunu said:

Midseason MVP, then he fell off the side of a cliff. We dont need a QB for 8 games.

Murray is not better than Prescott. Tannehill maybe. 

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Pretty good? Your definition of pretty good is a lot different than mine. Arizona's O-Line was marginal at best the majority of the year. Their running backs were mediocre. Their WR's were solid, but their defense got outscored by PJ Walker. I don't think he was surrounded pretty good. Not to mention, Kliff Kingsbury got fired from Taco Tech. He's not a good coach. 

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

I disagree. I think he's top 10 easily. There's an argument for Prescott, but RW is more injury prone than Kyler now and is much older. That's why I don't put him above him. He's clearly above Tannehill. It's not even close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries the past 2 years, from running, have derailed the cards season.   So yeah injury prone.   

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

3.7 yards per carry. A stellar 757 yards rushing. Eh. TD's are cool. But Jerome Bettis had a total of 9 TD's and 360 yards his last season. Was that a good year? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

He is injury prone due to his size and style of play.  When he stops looking to run his play isn’t as good.   See the playoff game as exhibit A

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Can we have him for just the #6 pick? No? Then move on, he is not worth it.

We are not winning the SB this season, we knew this season was going to suck when Rhule was retained, no reason to add insult to injury. Leave Kyler and his diva attitude in Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...