Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyler Murray?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, PootieNunu said:

Midseason MVP, then he fell off the side of a cliff. We dont need a QB for 8 games.

Murray is not better than Prescott. Tannehill maybe. 

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Pretty good? Your definition of pretty good is a lot different than mine. Arizona's O-Line was marginal at best the majority of the year. Their running backs were mediocre. Their WR's were solid, but their defense got outscored by PJ Walker. I don't think he was surrounded pretty good. Not to mention, Kliff Kingsbury got fired from Taco Tech. He's not a good coach. 

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

I disagree. I think he's top 10 easily. There's an argument for Prescott, but RW is more injury prone than Kyler now and is much older. That's why I don't put him above him. He's clearly above Tannehill. It's not even close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries the past 2 years, from running, have derailed the cards season.   So yeah injury prone.   

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

3.7 yards per carry. A stellar 757 yards rushing. Eh. TD's are cool. But Jerome Bettis had a total of 9 TD's and 360 yards his last season. Was that a good year? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

He is injury prone due to his size and style of play.  When he stops looking to run his play isn’t as good.   See the playoff game as exhibit A

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Can we have him for just the #6 pick? No? Then move on, he is not worth it.

We are not winning the SB this season, we knew this season was going to suck when Rhule was retained, no reason to add insult to injury. Leave Kyler and his diva attitude in Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...