Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyler Murray?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
Just now, PootieNunu said:

Midseason MVP, then he fell off the side of a cliff. We dont need a QB for 8 games.

Murray is not better than Prescott. Tannehill maybe. 

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

I guess a guy that plays at an MVP clip for at least half a season is not a top 10 QB now? Jesus. This guy is incorrigible. 

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Pretty good? Your definition of pretty good is a lot different than mine. Arizona's O-Line was marginal at best the majority of the year. Their running backs were mediocre. Their WR's were solid, but their defense got outscored by PJ Walker. I don't think he was surrounded pretty good. Not to mention, Kliff Kingsbury got fired from Taco Tech. He's not a good coach. 

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
Just now, PootieNunu said:

He is more like a top 15 QB. He has not put up the passing numbers to be a top 10 guy.

He does have the potential to be a top 10 guy, but he is not there yet. With his habits and attitude he may not ever get there. He is far away from the truly elite QBs and would have to do a lot of work to get there which I do not see him doing. 

I disagree. I think he's top 10 easily. There's an argument for Prescott, but RW is more injury prone than Kyler now and is much older. That's why I don't put him above him. He's clearly above Tannehill. It's not even close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries the past 2 years, from running, have derailed the cards season.   So yeah injury prone.   

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
Just now, joemac said:

I mean, James Connor had a pretty decent season last year. Over 1000 total yards and 18 TDs. LMAO @ Taco Tech. 

3.7 yards per carry. A stellar 757 yards rushing. Eh. TD's are cool. But Jerome Bettis had a total of 9 TD's and 360 yards his last season. Was that a good year? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

3 games in 3 years isn’t injury prone. Burrow has missed more on average than Kyler. I don’t want Kyler because I don’t want to pay out these huge QB contracts. We aren’t ready yet for that…

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His injuries has affected his play.    Christalmighty people am I the only one here that watches football?   

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, NCTHFL0567 said:

You literally said a QB that has missed 3 games in 3 years is injury prone. And you have the audacity to ask are you the only one that watches football? You might be the only one doing bath salts this morning. So there's that. 

He is injury prone due to his size and style of play.  When he stops looking to run his play isn’t as good.   See the playoff game as exhibit A

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

This reason is fine for me. But for the other people in here to say a guy is injury prone, make excuses, say he's not a top 10 QB, basically crap on him. When the alternative is a QB in a Draft class no one wants to draft a QB in? Yeah. Huddle gonna Huddle. 

Can we have him for just the #6 pick? No? Then move on, he is not worth it.

We are not winning the SB this season, we knew this season was going to suck when Rhule was retained, no reason to add insult to injury. Leave Kyler and his diva attitude in Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...