Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell's Pro Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, travisura said:

Homer or not, choosing to die on the hill that Howell is the undisputed best QB in this class is an interesting choice. I guess you're rooting for him to go to the Steelers so you can root for them and finally give up on the Panthers like you've been threatening to do for months now. I guess we shall see.

I'm pretty much ready to give up on Tepper's Panthers. 

Howell being the best QB in the draft is my opinion. I don't think it's undisputed. There is no Luck or Lawrence in this draft that checks every "once in a decade" box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i can certainly respect howells maturity when things didnt go well and his stock dropped. 

 

he looks like baker mayfield but thats anti baker mayfield behavior 

 

like i said, I like howell and would like to take a chance on him at the right spot.  but not at 6.  Across the board everyone is saying this is a weak QB class and nowhere have i seen him ranked in the top two

 

sure, take a chance in him at the right spot as a value reclamation pick. id be all for that. 

Go back one year and he was QB1 to many. All he did last year was prove he's more of a threat with his legs than previously thought. So....we can get the QB everyone thought was the best of this crop a year ago for a discount because his team struggled last year. Not because he did. Sounds great to me. 

Everyone yelled "UNC Homers" when we suggested Trubisky would be the best play before last year. Well look how it played out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Go back one year and he was QB1 to many. All he did last year was prove he's more of a threat with his legs than previously thought. So....we can get the QB everyone thought was the best of this crop a year ago for a discount because his team struggled last year. Not because he did. Sounds great to me. 

Everyone yelled "UNC Homers" when we suggested Trubisky would be the best play before last year. Well look how it played out. 

read the rest of the thread I agree with you.  Id be ok with howell at the right spot

 

trade back and pick up an extra second..  take BPA Left Tackle and take howell

 

and too be honest, some points in here make sense and UNC fans have a different perspective than the average draft analyst. so tbh my opinion of howell is better after this thread

 

my main point was that UNC fans saying hes the best QB hands down i thought that was very homeristic behavior   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

at the end of the day, even if the panthers think hes good enough to be taken at 6 and be the face of the franchise, I'm on board. 

 

cause IM a panthers Homer and pretty much every decision the panthers make I can talk myself into how that was a good decision

 

im not a full fledged homer though. I CHOOSE to be optimistic about the panthers and get on board with what they are doing.  I just enjoy the NFL and the panthers that way.  

 

sure ill give my opinions and defend the panthers in stuff but a lot of the time its just for the sake of the argument and fleshing out the reasoning and thinking behind things 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

i can certainly respect howells maturity when things didnt go well and his stock dropped. 

 

he looks like baker mayfield but thats anti baker mayfield behavior 

 

like i said, I like howell and would like to take a chance on him at the right spot.  but not at 6.  Across the board everyone is saying this is a weak QB class and nowhere have i seen him ranked in the top two

 

sure, take a chance in him at the right spot as a value reclamation pick. id be all for that. 

I've always said that physically Baker is a good comp for Howell. Baker has a bit stronger arm, Howell is a bit better of an athlete.

There's a big difference between the ears though. Baker would've had an absolute meltdown at Carolina last year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I've always said that physically Baker is a good comp for Howell. Baker has a bit stronger arm, Howell is a bit better of an athlete.

There's a big difference between the ears though. Baker would've had an absolute meltdown at Carolina last year.

now that it has been brought up, the point about Howells maturity truly is something to admire

 

When you are a highly touted NfL draft prospect that had #1 OVR potential but poo goes bad around you causing you to fall in the draft, literally costing you millions, but stay composed, take responsibility and be a leader..  i really respect that and didnt really think about that before

 

SOMETHING made him considered widely the too prospect a year ago. tbh im not too familiar with Howell so i dont know his strengths and weaknesses.  i only know what rankings ive seen and where  but i know he has talent.  things have fallen short with him and UNC one way or another

 

getting a franchise QB for pennies on the dollar i am all for..  if not living up to expectations caused a scenario where the panthers can get him at a value price, then so be it.   it was meant to be.  

 

I like value.  and getting howell at the back of the 1st or early 2nd id be stoked honestly. especially if we land a franchise LT as well 

 

im starting to ramble thats what Kratom does to me

 

 

 

sometimes i come on the huddle just to be a pointy instigator.  a lot of my responses are exagerated.  mainly because in real life, im very quiet, considerate, polite.  its hard for me to be rude to someone to their face.  on the huddle im able to let that rudeness come out and be able to express some of my less desirable qualities that dont incorporate in my persona aka "mask" to the real world.  little bit of Jungian shadow psychology right there.

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

SOMETHING made him considered widely the too prospect a year ago. tbh im not too familiar with Howell so i dont know his strengths and weaknesses.  i only know what rankings ive seen and where  but i know he has talent.  things have fallen short with him and UNC one way or another 

I think @LinvilleGorge brought up a really good point in this respect. Their best chance to win was to get him out of the pocket faster since they had no skill position guys and no OLine. Go try and find UNC players in a mock draft simulator if you don’t believe me. Looking like they’ll maybe have 3 non-Howell players drafted this season and none before the 5th round: RB, OL, and LB.
 

Howell is good, but let’s not take him at #6

Edited by John_Sutter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, John_Sutter said:

I think @LinvilleGorge brought up a really good point in this respect. Their best chance to win was to get him out of the pocket faster since they had no skill position guys and no OLine. Go try and find UNC players in a mock draft simulator if you don’t believe me. Looking like they’ll maybe have 3 non-Howell players drafted this season and non before the 5th round. 
 

Howell is good, but let’s not take him at #6

All the criticisms of being one read and run are valid for this year but it was out of sheer necessity. He almost never ran prior to this year. The coaches actually told him not to because we didn't have a viable backup.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Howell is the best QB in the draft because he has all the tools and he has shown he can handle adversity without getting rattled or frustrated. UNC was horrible last year. The OL absolutely fell apart and there was only one legit receiver on the roster. Howell had never ran before and transitioned to a one read and bolt QB out of necessity. I didn't need to see Howell go through progressions. I'd already seen it. What I got to see last year is how Howell handled getting the absolute hell beat out of him while having to carry the entire offense and not having a defense to lean on. Anyone who was high on Howell prior should honestly be even higher on him. Don't watch the team, watch the player.

That slow ass delivery tho...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...