Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who do you like at QB?


MHS831
 Share

Forget trade backs and veteran trades--who would you like to see as the New QB in 2022?  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Select one:

    • Baker Mayfield
      7
    • Jimmy Garappolo
      8
    • Malik Willis
      31
    • Sam Howell
      12
    • Kenny Pickett
      22
    • Matt Corral
      27
    • Desmond Ridder
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/01/2022 at 03:03 AM

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Thompcat said:

The business side says go with Willis because of the upside and if he doesn't show progress with this staff start over next year. If the new staff likes Willis let them develop him. 

The personal side don't do a kid that way with this staff. Don't draft him and him get screwed up by this group. 

This is such a fallacy for so many reasons

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

I would have picked Sam but not an option. It's the QB this staff deserves.

I am not sold on this class of QBs, especially when you match them to our staff and situation. I also don't want to spend on Vets again after the last 2 years. I think Meh is restrained at this point in the 'process'.

I should have included Sam--I was not clear-I should have stated it as the addition of the 3rd QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

When he's still throwing backbreaking interceptions will you Darnold fans be gone finally? It might be worth it for that.

Its not about being a darnold fan, its about making Rhule fix his mistake and not overdrafting some scrub qb to try and save his job.  Tepper should be like "hell no dough boy, you gave up assets for darnold, said he was talented, now go make it work"

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Would have chosen Sam, if he were an option, as that's what I would prefer to see this season..no more money spent or picks wasted by this coaching staff.

That said, my answer depends on what happens in the draft.  I don't want Jimmy on this team...he just get's us into a position that we may have to keep Rhule, even if we didn't want to...say 9 wins and we miss the playoffs.

If I'm picking at 6, I don't want a rookie.  If we just HAVE TO HAVE ONE in the 1st, please trade back for an additional 2nd.

I'd prefer to sit and take the best OT that's available, and roll with Sam.

I really like Corral and would like him on our team. But part of me feels like Tepper is fed up. He gave Rhule Bridgewater and results sucked. He gave Rhule Darnold….even worse. My gut feeling is that Tepper told Fitt: “If we take another QB and don’t get other premier players…and that Qb sucks then it’s both your asses.” 
 

The good news is I think both Rhule and Fitt are making FOR SURE that if there is a QB other than SD this year then it’s one of two scenarios:

1. A veteran they KNOW is an upgrade - Carr (if his contract falls through) or Murray at this point. This is why they aren’t interested in Baker. 
 

2. A Rookie QB who comes in WITH a BPA option as either a second 1st round pick or a high 2nd round pick. 
 

Idt there is ANY WAY in hell that Fitterer is hitching his wagon to one of these rookies as his only 1st round pick. No way does that happen. It’s professional suicide (with this organization). If the rookie sucks then Tepper is going to be so pissed he’ll fire Rhule and Tepper for risking it all again with a sole pick of a QB. 
 

So….only way the rookie happens imo is if we trade down.    

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its not about being a darnold fan, its about making Rhule fix his mistake and not overdrafting some scrub qb to try and save his job.  Tepper should be like "hell no dough boy, you gave up assets for darnold, said he was talented, now go make it work"

It should be about what's best for the Panthers not Sam Darnold or Matt Rhule. If it's best for us to send the mole packing even if we have to eat the cap hit then do it. Stop kissing frogs as Florio said.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

It should be about what's best for the Panthers not Sam Darnold or Matt Rhule. If it's best for us to send the mole packing even if we have to eat the cap hit then do it. Stop kissing frogs as Florio said.

You are thinking short term, I am thinking long term.  Getting some poo vet in here to win 7-8 games isnt going to do jack poo in the grand scheme of things

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

If that's the case than we wasted a ton of money on decent free agents.  Why sign all these players if we are playing for 2023.  

I imagine the NFL frowns on teams not competing.  The guys on a 1-year (Haynes, Bozeman, Littleton, and Loanidas) are all on pretty cheap deals.  I imagine they can find similar players next year or maybe these guys return. 

We have 6 picks this year and we should have a full complement next year.  We only roster 53 guys so everyone can't be on a 2+ year contract and expect all draftees to make the team.  Keep your homegrown talent and build through the draft means a few 1-year contracts along the way.

I think they believe they can be competitive throughout the year if things come together and CMC plays a full year.  If we are hovering around .500 and in the playoff picture, fans will remain engaged and tuning in.  Hell, we were above .500 last year when CMC played, despite the Darnold and a horrendous offense (scheme and OL).

This roster will not win a superb owl, but hopefully it will compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frankw said:

When he's still throwing backbreaking interceptions will you Darnold fans be gone finally? It might be worth it for that.

I don't know him personally ,but I'm pulling for the guy.  He's probably the starting QB for my favorite NFL team.  I guess that makes me a fan?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grimesgoat said:

I don't know him personally ,but I'm pulling for the guy.  He's probably the starting QB for my favorite NFL team.  I guess that makes me a fan?

Excuse me sir I am a Panthers fan first. Continuing with the worst starting QB in years (check the stats) to appease his fans is not helpful to my team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...