Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers favor Malik Willis?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Agree but if they think he's the next Josh Allen or whatever I'd have to take him on a rookie deal, fire Rhule and get a coach that wants to coach him next year. I think we did enough on the O-line in free agency to be comfortable taking a shot. I'm hoping Fitt is thinking long term/post-Rhule. If it's Neal/Ikey/Willis or trade out I'm cool with that. 

I would agree but I would suspect he would just be wasting his first year of that rookie deal and still need to sit a year with a good staff which would be 2/5ths of his rookie contract. So we may have a QB in 3 years?

Just draft a better prospect, for us, next year would be a better play conceptually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I keep reading this narrative, but the coaching staff (minus Rhule) is pretty solid now. We will see how much a difference that makes going forward. 

It's pretty meh. An improvement from last year sure but I wouldn't use the words quality, good or exciting to describe this staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Cam is 6'5" Willis is barely over 6 feet.  Willis will get killed a la RGIII if he tries that in the NFL.  Cam lasted 8 years as big has he was.  How long do you think Willis will last.  Plus his accuracy is terrible.  

Russell Wilson doesn't get killed.. Lamar Jackson, Kyle Murray who is 5 '10. He's playing at 230 at 6'0 which is consider big even for Rb standards. But he isn't going to be playing rb or running 100% of the time. I would definitely give him 5-7 designed runs a game to keep defense honest.. 

His accuracy doesn't look as bad as you make it out to be and when given the time he looks good. If was as bad a thrower as you make it out to be do you think all these teams and gms would be ranking him the number 1 qb? Come on now we gotta read between the lines. Guy isn't just a kid running around cause he can't compete a pass. That's nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Agree but if they think he's the next Josh Allen or whatever I'd have to take him on a rookie deal, fire Rhule and get a coach that wants to coach him next year. I think we did enough on the O-line in free agency to be comfortable taking a shot. I'm hoping Fitt is thinking long term/post-Rhule. If it's Neal/Ikey/Willis or trade out I'm cool with that. 

This is all I'm saying these are my 3 ideal picks maybe ikey/Neal/Willis but these 3 at 6 plz. Or trade down 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Russell Wilson doesn't get killed.. Lamar Jackson, Kyle Murray who is 5 '10. He's playing at 230 at 6'0 which is consider big even for Rb standards. But he isn't going to be playing rb or running 100% of the time. I would definitely give him 5-7 designed runs a game to keep defense honest.. 

His accuracy doesn't look as bad as you make it out to be and when given the time he looks good. If was as bad a thrower as you make it out to be do you think all these teams and gms would be ranking him the number 1 qb? Come on now we gotta read between the lines. Guy isn't just a kid running around cause he can't compete a pass. That's nonsense.

Murray and Jackson missed time just this year due to running.  Murray also got banged up in his shoulder last season from running.  Give me an accurate pocket passer in the burrow mold that knows how to navigate things when pressure is coming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I would agree but I would suspect he would just be wasting his first year of that rookie deal and still need to sit a year with a good staff which would be 2/5ths of his rookie contract. So we may have a QB in 3 years?

Just draft a better prospect, for us, next year would be a better play conceptually. 

I mean McAdoo sucked as a head coach but he has tons of experience, Manning still speaks highly of him helping fix his timing and footwork

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

This is all I'm saying these are my 3 ideal picks maybe ikey/Neal/Willis but these 3 at 6 plz. Or trade down 

I have no idea why people keep saying this.  We cant simply just "trade down" unless Fitt is going for pennies on the dollar.   We didnt take the Bears haul last year and now we have an even better draft pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean McAdoo sucked as a head coach but he has tons of experience, Manning still speaks highly of him helping fix his timing and footwork

Cool but he isn't a QB coach but an OC here. Add in the Rhule factors and I still don't see the reason for any hype. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Murray and Jackson missed time just this year due to running.  Murray also got banged up in his shoulder last season from running.  Give me an accurate pocket passer in the burrow mold that knows how to navigate things when pressure is coming. 

I didn't see the specific plays they got hurt on so I will defer. But over their careers* Lamar had been pretty durable and Murray been fine as well. Cam for being the running qb got hurt in the pocket.. there is no one hit that is going to take you out. Qbs get hit even in the pocket. Just because you run as well doesn't mean your going to get hit qbs slide and run out of bounds to avoid unnecessary hits.

Burrow was a number 1 overall pick...consensus. those are rare. Plus even he isn't a statue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sunday Ticket is now offering a monthly subscription if you're not interested in subscribing for the full package Keep in mind that the full package will be less expensive than getting billed monthly for the same timeframe.  But for a one-off month situation? Certainly an option to consider they also don't seem to mind if 2 households share the same Sunday Ticket login. If you call and ask for discounts, they kinda allude to "do you have a friend you can share the cost with" in the conversation
    • Watching ALL the games will require: Antenna or cable access to local broadcast partners to view the games of the local team. Due to blackout restrictions, the local games will not be available on Sunday Ticket.  What this means is that you DON'T NEED Sunday Ticket to view those local team's games. All games for a local team will ALWAYS be available on a local broadcast partner, no subscription required I've had success streaming the evening Sunday and Monday national games directly off the NFL/NBC/ABC websites, no subscription required. That said, ESPN may require login via your cable provider account - but it's included in your cable fee, so have fun with that.  NBC is available for free via antenna (or avail via cable, take your pick -- and ABC has been simulcasting the ESPN games, so that's also an antenna/free optio. The Peacock and Netflix exclusive games will require subscriptions to those services if the teams are not your local team YouTube will broadcast the Brazil game free  NFL Network for those random thursday games that aren't your local team... until the ESPN partnership comes into play, in which case your ESPN subscription should give you access (lots of assumptions with this bullet) Everything else is pretty much Sunday Ticket or go to your local bar I may have missed one, but the general gist is above In short, don't believe the online influences who say you need to purchase a full-year subscription to a service to watch "all" the NFL games (ie full year of Peacock). Because you don't need a full-year sub.   So no -- there is not a single service that will let you watch ALL the games Sunday Ticket will only cover you only for the sunday daytime games.
    • Aaaaaaand... ND immediately throws an INT. Tried to run that same screen they've ran a dozen times tonight and Miami had two defenders sitting on it and he threw it anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...