Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orlovsky: Pickett doesn’t have anything that isn’t coachable


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, CRA said:

yet he stunk for 4 years at Pitt.  Had one good season in year 5 that happened to be in a down year for the ACC (which is still weak in a strong year). 

We are going to spend the #6 overall QB on a guy who is basically on par as a prospect overall as a Will Grier.  But Grier at least was drafted rightfully in the 3rd round.  Which is what would have happened to Pickett in a good draft class too. 

He was average for 4 years but was a Heisman finalist last season and was very good.  He isn't Will Grier but if you feel that way enjoy it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, CRA said:

yet he stunk for 4 years at Pitt.  Had one good season in year 5 that happened to be in a down year for the ACC (which is still weak in a strong year). 

We are going to spend the #6 overall QB on a guy who is basically on par as a prospect overall as a Will Grier.  But Grier at least was drafted rightfully in the 3rd round.  Which is what would have happened to Pickett in a good draft class too.

So by ACC having a down year, you mean Clemson sucked? Because that was the only real difference. Well maybe besides Pitt and WF having an up year..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

yet he stunk for 4 years at Pitt.  Had one good season in year 5 that happened to be in a down year for the ACC (which is still weak in a strong year). 

We are going to spend the #6 overall QB on a guy who is basically on par as a prospect overall as a Will Grier.  But Grier at least was drafted rightfully in the 3rd round.  Which is what would have happened to Pickett in a good draft class too. 

You and I have a dramatically different definition of stunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

So by ACC having a down year, you mean Clemson sucked? Because that was the only real difference. Well maybe besides Pitt and WF having an up year..

On top of the ACC power having an offense that made the Carolina Panther offense look good last season? Well...

the Coastal Division Pitt plays in was super weak last year.  Miami and UNC finished as top 25 teams the year prior.  Both stunk last year.   ND was part of the ACC the year prior too who finished top 5 with Clemson and they were removed from the equation.   

ACC was definately weaker Pickett's one good season than it was the season prior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

On top of the ACC power having an offense that made the Carolina Panther offense look good last season? Well...

the Coastal Division Pitt plays in was super weak last year.  Miami and UNC finished as top 25 teams the year prior.  Both stunk last year.   ND was part of the ACC the year prior too who finished top 5 with Clemson and they were removed from the equation.   

ACC was definately weaker Pickett's one good season than it was the season prior. 

Adding ND to the ACC for ONE year due to covid doesn't help your cause. 

UNC and MIA are never consistent ACC contenders. They're usually pretty meh. They had down years. Pitt and wake forest had up years. So looks like a wash to me,in the overall ACC standing. 

Clemson is the only true contenders in the ACC. They were completely underwhelming. They were the only real difference in the conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

He was average for 4 years but was a Heisman finalist last season and was very good.  He isn't Will Grier but if you feel that way enjoy it.  

yeah, so was Will Grier.  Will Grier was Heisman finalist and was very good his last season.  He actually had 2 very good seasons back to back(unlike Pickett).   Grier also played a tougher SOS in both his good seasons than Pickett did in his one. 

If Pickett was coming into the NFL last season or even Will Grier's seasons....no one would be talking about spending a 1st round pick on him.  And certainly not the #6 overall pick.   

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

Adding ND to the ACC for ONE year due to covid doesn't help your cause. 

UNC and MIA are never consistent ACC contenders. They're usually pretty meh. They had down years. Pitt and wake forest had up years. So looks like a wash to me,in the overall ACC standing. 

Clemson is the only true contenders in the ACC. They were completely underwhelming. They were the only real difference in the conference.

Who you play in a year is who you play in a year.   2021 was a super easy schedule vs teams Pitt played in 2020.  

ND joining certainly is relevant.  Pitt had to play them in 2020.   Didn't in 2021.  It's also relevant if UNC or Miami or Clemson were having good years or bad years.   If you are simply contrasting how weak or strong the ACC was from one year to another.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to draft Pickett, but calling him a 1-year wonder is a little disengenuous.

I went back and looked at the covid-filled 2020 season.  Pitt was 6-5, but he did not play in 2 of the losses.  2 of his losses were by 1 point to BC and NC State.  So he was a couple points away from an 8-1 record.

His only bad game was against Clemson, where he tossed 4 of his 9 ints.

Again, not interested in him - rather go with Darnold.  Just trying to be fair.  He didn't actually stink in 2020.  I did not look at 2017-2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I don't want to draft Pickett, but calling him a 1-year wonder is a little disengenuous.

I went back and looked at the covid-filled 2020 season.  Pitt was 6-5, but he did not play in 2 of the losses.  2 of his losses were by 1 point to BC and NC State.  So he was a couple points away from an 8-1 record.

His only bad game was against Clemson, where he tossed 4 of his 9 ints.

Again, not interested in him - rather go with Darnold.  Just trying to be fair.  He didn't actually stink in 2020.  I did not look at 2017-2019.

he didn't stink.  But he wasn't good.   He had 1 good season in a 5 year career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

he didn't stink.  But he wasn't good.   He had 1 good season in a 5 year career. 

I'd characterize it as a couple good years, then a freakishly good year.

Again - not advocating for him.  I would much rather wait a year as the next class looks stacked.  But if Pickett is picked, I will remain positive and learn to live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I'd characterize it as a couple good years, then a freakishly good year.

Again - not advocating for him.  I would much rather wait a year as the next class looks stacked.  But if Pickett is picked, I will remain positive and learn to live with it.

13 TDs, 9 INTs.  That was 2020 and 2019.

That’s a low bar for good season. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

yeah, so was Will Grier.  Will Grier was Heisman finalist and was very good his last season.  He actually had 2 very good seasons back to back(unlike Pickett).   Grier also played a tougher SOS in both his good seasons than Pickett did in his one. 

If Pickett was coming into the NFL last season or even Will Grier's seasons....no one would be talking about spending a 1st round pick on him.  And certainly not the #6 overall pick.   

 

You could find many dudes that has good seasons with good stats and say “look they are the same”.  Pickett is more talented than Grier IMO.  If you don’t think so fine

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...