Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper OverRhule’s the HC?


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I already responded to this earlier. The proven players got multi year contacts.

I assumed you had considered the Ravens center as being one of the centerpieces of their class, he only received a one year deal as I recall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Growl said:

I assumed you had considered the Ravens center as being one of the centerpieces of their class, he only received a one year deal as I recall

He just moved to center last year and had success. Before that he was an ok OG. He got a 1 year 2.8 million dollar contract. That’s shows where the market sees him. He should be solid, but that one year protects us in case he fails. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2022 at 6:30 PM, Basbear said:

I have to think the Browns must pay 50-75% of his contract in order to get a late round pick, sorta like with the Teddy deal with the panthers....

If Browns do that and Baker is 8 million for a 2024 7th....Im up for a gamble. Panthers would only be paying the QB room around 30 million in total, thats not too bad......if you dont look at the names....

Could ease the pressure to draft a Qb at 6 which I would view as a positive. Why should anyone want whoever chose (and paid) the last two Qbs to choose another? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Iced Up said:

Could ease the pressure to draft a Qb at 6 which I would view as a positive. Why should anyone want whoever chose (and paid) the last two Qbs to choose another? 

 

 

Baker would be just a test to see if hes sticks. 2020 Baker was pettty dam good, recent was meh... I mean panthers not only need a starter, but a backup.....AND maybe a developmental type as well. I could see drafting one AND adding baker/minshew/jimmy. Plus Im not 100% Sam Darnold is pure trash either, hated the move for him, but for 4 seasons he has been running for his life nearly right after the snap.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t really know what is happening behind the scenes but QB has to be at the top of the debates.  I find it hard to believe anyone is talking Tepper into rolling with Darnold for another year but who knows.

I will stand with this prediction…if Neal and Ikey are gone we will take Pickett.  Might take Pickett anyway.

Pickett would be a solid pick IMO.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I don’t really know what is happening behind the scenes but QB has to be at the top of the debates.  I find it hard to believe anyone is talking Tepper into rolling with Darnold for another year but who knows.

I will stand with this prediction…if Neal and Ikey are gone we will take Pickett.  Might take Pickett anyway 

I think the main reason for hiring Ben Macado was his NFL QB success. Rhule and whoever else has been making the QB decisions since the day 1 Rhule era, needs to be banned for all QBs decisions. Give Ben ALLLLLL the QB power.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see improving the roster, especially the OL, as a better plan than giving up all kinds of stuff for someone that isn't That much better than Darnold could be with that kind of help.

 

And I don't understand the We Have To Win This Year mentality. I don't see the point of a 9-8 season myself. I'd rather be rid of Rhule, rid of Darnold, with a nice high pick in 2023. 2-15 would be alright with me to be honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...