Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Good of a person is Cam..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CanadianCat said:

Man I just feel for kids with 'weird' names. I means Cam's kids names are way out there but even my friends wanted to make their kids name's 'unique' and just made up spellings for them. Those kids will go through life CONSTANTLY correcting people on how to spell it and that grinds on you. 

Heck my name is Alan and it can be spelled Alan, Allan or Allen (as the more common ways) most people spell my name Allan and as a kid that really irked me. Now I dont even bother to correct them.. so yeah.. I feel for kids with odd names. 

I'd say they are far better than Abcde.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/29/2022 at 5:05 PM, tiger7_88 said:

People hate Cam because they WANT to hate Cam.

Including a hefty percentage of Carolina “fans” who are complete and utter misanthropes.

They usually begin their posts, re: Cam Newton, like this:

”I’m Cam’s biggest fan! BUT… “

”I *love* Cam! BUT… “

”Cam is my favorite player! BUT… “

Sure fire sign of the misanthropic liar.

I was told this expression a long time ago...."everything before the BUT doesn't count."

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

He's gonna end up broke...

...but will still be a good person 👍.

Nah!! Ppl don't give credit to Cam's business sense.. He's got a couple of thriving businesses not including the content creating and production company..

poo I forgot that Dude got a few non profit companies that make profit..

Example..

His 7 on 7 league is close to being a established entity scouts and ppl pay to see and participate..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Nah!! Ppl don't give credit to Cam's business sense.. He's got a couple of thriving businesses not including the content creating and production company..

poo I forgot that Dude got a few non profit companies that make profit..

Example..

His 7 on 7 league is close to being a established entity scouts and ppl pay to see and participate..

Nah!!  

What kind of revenues does the 7-on-7 league generate?

And the other "thriving businesses" are?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I checked this just out of curiosity, Cams career net earnings are north of 200M (Endorsments contracts ect minus taxes) having 75m left of that isn't what I would call judicious investment, he's far from broke this period near the end of football careers is were you have to tighten up and make good long term investments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I checked this just out of curiosity, Cams career net earnings are north of 200M (Endorsments contracts ect minus taxes) having 75m left of that isn't what I would call judicious investment, he's far from broke this period near the end of football careers is were you have to tighten up and make good long term investments.

I don't know where you got North of 200 mil..

https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/cam-newton-net-worth-and-salary

This says 122.5 million over his career so far..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...