Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So what position do we address now


54th man
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would not be surprised to see a TE--we have 2, but a third that is more of a receiving weapon.  There are some still on the board, fwiw.

LB--yes

WR--with Shi's recent legal troubles and the potential for Marshall to bust, we might need another WR.

DT--not sure I love the depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

I haven’t looked but you might could find a legit slot WR.   A Renfrow type.  They often are in these later rounds.   

I was joking because I don't think I've ever seen this many receivers taken at this point in the draft before. 17/105 picks have been WRs so far. Insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

charlie kolar (I'm not sold on our TEs), the Nebraska LB (tweener like Chinn but more on LB side), and/or the LB from LSU- Clarke (who won't play this year but is a starter talent). 

we could use another NT/DT type to pair with Brown. Maybe the kid from LSU, Neil Farrell.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I was joking because I don't think I've ever seen this many receivers taken at this point in the draft before. 17/105 picks have been WRs so far. Insane.

Is that how many have been taken? Geez, that's a hell of a lot. I thought it felt like receiver was the pick almost every few picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
×
×
  • Create New...