Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?


iamhubby1
 Share

With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?  

141 members have voted

  1. 1. With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?

    • NO.
      36
    • MAYBE. After all, we are still young.
      71
    • YES
      34


Recommended Posts

I think offensively if CMC stays healthy we are going to score some points.   I would prefer to see Corral under center but as long as Darnold has CMC he'll play better. 

I would like to see us sign a DE.  I am not sure whether Gross-Matos is going to final show his worth.  This is year 3 and he's got to step up.  If we can get some pressure I think we have the secondary to create some coverage sacks but we need that pressure.

If the defense shows up, which I believe it will.  We might surprise some folks. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

IMO, this is the best roster we have had is a long while. Quality QB play would put us in the competitive bracket. I like Corall, and am hopeful he can rise to the occasion. Because if he can, we can be something.

We are still extremely susceptible to the run which means we are still extremely susceptible to play action which is what wins games in the NFL.  Until the run gets shored up and we get a possession WR we still arent exactly a QB away.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think offensively if CMC stays healthy we are going to score some points.   I would prefer to see Corral under center but as long as Darnold has CMC he'll play better. 

I would like to see us sign a DE.  I am not sure whether Gross-Matos is going to final show his worth.  This is year 3 and he's got to step up.  If we can get some pressure I think we have the secondary to create some coverage sacks but we need that pressure.

If the defense shows up, which I believe it will.  We might surprise some folks. 

 

My only fear is that Rhule won't play Corall even after he learns the playbook, and can run some practices. Corall has to earn that start asap.

 

Yeah, that front 7 is a tad shaky right now. There is talent there, so there is a chance we can improve. Cuz if that front 7 plays well, that D could be really good.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

We are still extremely susceptible to the run which means we are still extremely susceptible to play action which is what wins games in the NFL.  Until the run gets shored up and we get a possession WR we still arent exactly a QB away.

 

@Davidson Deac IIshowed a stat recently that said we were 9th in yards per run. If we can stay right around there? We should be good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No because we have an idiot for a HC. Now, replace him with a competent HC and I think it's a maybe. The question is how much our of our 2020-2022 draft talent pans out. 2020 and 2021 aren't looking stellar early. If those classes only end up with 1-2 real hits, this is a definite no. If we get a few more guys to pan out, this leans toward yes.

That is what is the key, how much of our recent(Rhule era) draft talent actually pans out.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No because we have an idiot for a HC. Now, replace him with a competent HC and I think it's a maybe. The question is how much our of our 2020-2022 draft talent pans out. 2020 and 2021 aren't looking stellar early. If those classes only end up with 1-2 real hits, this is a definite no. If we get a few more guys to pan out, this leans toward yes.

That is what is the key, how much of our recent(Rhule era) draft talent actually pans out.

 

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

In before, "this coaching staff can't win with any amount of talent"

EDIT: Damn, just missed it.

 

So do you not believe that Coaches can improve? Because our coach has added some highly resected coaches to his staff. This just might be a positive. Rhule has less day to day crap to deal with. Leaving him plenty of time to work his magic.

 

Saying a Coach is bad is not the end all. There is always hope for improvement. 

 

Me? I would rather hope for improvement. It is better for the digestion.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

front 7 on defense is pretty suspect.  And Reddick was a pretty big loss comparing last year to this year. 

we also only have 1 reliable WR/TE in the pass game and that is DJ.  So we have to add to that. 

and to some extent, many just have defaulted us into now having a strong OL in 2022 just because we have added new bodies.   We have seen that before even in recent times.   Where you can't just check the box at as it existing and solved because we have new guys in town.   

and obviously, to be competive does require good in game management, gameplanning and roster decisions.  And those presently are still things people hope will occur but to date haven't under Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

front 7 on defense is pretty suspect.  And Reddick was a pretty big loss comparing last year to this year. 

we also only have 1 reliable WR/TE in the pass game and that is DJ.  So we have to add to that. 

and to some extent, many just have defaulted us into now having a strong OL in 2022 just because we have added new bodies.   We have seen that before even in recent times.   Where you can't just check the box at as it existing and solved because we have new guys in town.   

and obviously, to be competive does require good in game management, gameplanning and roster decisions.  And those presently are still things people hope will occur but to date haven't under Rhule. 

 

So...because you failed to tell us how you voted, we are left to guess. And by this post? I'mma say it's a solid no for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...