Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

June 1st Cuts


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

we'll probably be looking at LBs an DTs....no pass rushers worth anything will be let go because they're too valuable.  Rhule said he wanted a LT, QB and pass rusher, and we got the first 2 in the draft.

This. Anything the will help then run D. We need help pretty equally at DT and ILB so we'll probably look at those.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Need for Panthers to cut Derrick Brown. Send a message to the team. 

It will also send a message that the FO is stupider than we think.  Cut a Starting DT on a rookie salary because he isn’t progressing like we think he should. Backfill him with someone that plays about the same but costs more.   
 

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

It will also send a message that the FO is stupider than we think.  Cut a Starting DT on a rookie salary because he isn’t progressing like we think he should. Backfill him with someone that plays about the same but costs more.   
 

 

I was half way joking around when I said that. I know we can’t cut him now but this is a huge year for him. Did they pick up his option yet? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

we'll probably be looking at LBs an DTs....no pass rushers worth anything will be let go because they're too valuable.  Rhule said he wanted a LT, QB and pass rusher, and we got the first 2 in the draft.

Mostly you're correct.  However some teams draft replacement player (1st rounders) and would be looking to play them and save money with the rookies.  And if I am correct, June 1st cuts gives them the opportunity to spread the money out over a couple of years. (100% if that is correct)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I also just read where Quinn wants out of Chicago.

He's 32 and had a career year last year with 18.5 sack.  I am sure part of his success was because he was opposite K. Mack who is now in SD.

He's under contract until 2024. 

Report: Bears Pro Bowl DE Robert Quinn 'wants out of Chicago' (msn.com)

 

think he's from Charleston...he might want to come here.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

I was half way joking around when I said that. I know we can’t cut him now but this is a huge year for him. Did they pick up his option yet? 

 

1 hour ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Not sure about the option.  Apologies I took the post as literal.  

You can't pick up a player's 5th year option in their 3rd year. Dude's trolling.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...