Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic Expectations for 4th-7th Rounders


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's especially perplexing because of how good he looked in camp and preseason. Honestly, he looked like possibly the best rookie WR in the league in preseason. Then... basically he just disappeared.

 

I'm not totally convinced it was all about talent.  Something makes me feel that the Rhule Rookie effect was in place.  In preseason he wasn't just playing well against 2nd teamers he had a couple really nice catches against 1st team talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not totally convinced it was all about talent.  Something makes me feel that the Rhule Rookie effect was in place.  In preseason he wasn't just playing well against 2nd teamers he had a couple really nice catches against 1st team talent. 

I mean....I guess maybe that could be true. I don't know. It's rare a player just completely disappears to the level he did.

I hope it's just a dum-dum Rhule issue. If not.....woof. That 2021 draft already looks pretty bad as it is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Agreed. That is about how I slot them.

That was one reason why Marshall was such a head scratcher from last season. Genuinely perplexed by how ineffective he was. That was a guy I was sure was going to be a season one contributor. 

I feel the same, but I also have to look at last season with that entire offense. What we saw on the field wasn't great and it always made me think there were off-field issues that were affecting it. Maybe the ineptitude and strife hit the rookie hard and he'll come back better this year.

We'll just have to wait and see. Still, second rounders aren't a sure thing either, but you expect more than we got.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean....I guess maybe that could be true. I don't know. It's rare a player just completely disappears to the level he did.

I hope it's just a dum-dum Rhule issue. If not.....woof. That 2021 draft already looks pretty bad as it is.

I'm not so down on the 2021 draft.  Many of those players got in games last year and hopefully they have grown some.  I don't think we've ever had a draft where they actually played on game day.  

We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problems that stick out in my mind from the Hurney era was not as much drafting the wrong second and third rounders, but drafting guys in those rounds who were not second or third rounders on anybody's board.  It was like the guy thought he was some oracle of seeing talent nobody else could recognize, results not withstanding.

My jury on the last two drafts is still far from a verdict.  When I see almost an entire class regress, and I see the following class frustratingly not be put in positions to succeed or fail, that results in a concern about the guys deciding how to use the tools, not the quality of the tools themselves.

But, back to the original point, I agree.  It is said the number one cause of disappointment is unrealistic expectations, and when you get beyond the third round (or even deep into it), expecting the guy you drafted has just started his march to the HoF is setting him up for failure and yourself up for disappointment.  Sometimes they work out, but the odds are steep enough that the expectations should be tempered.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm not so down on the 2021 draft.  Many of those players got in games last year and hopefully they have grown some.  I don't think we've ever had a draft where they actually played on game day.  

We'll see.

Yeah, but getting into games and getting  meaningful time is completely different. A chunk of that PT was due to injuries or poor performances from players ahead of them.

From our 2020 guys, we need to see a clear improvement and the start of being a solid NFL professional. From our 2021 guys, we just need to see the incremental improvement that shows they are learning and progressing.

Brown definitely has a critical year coming. He has to show consistency and shore up his technique issues that lead to him getting out of position so much. If he can't get that accomplished, he's leaning bust at three years of starting experience. For YGM, we need to see him basically come in and establish himself as a starter or critical rotation guy. Establish yourself as the DE that should get the most reps on that side. Chinn we just need to see get better at coverage and understanding his role as a safety. If all those things happen, 2021 was a home run class. If none of them happen, it's not looking great.

For 2021, it's just about getting Horn on the field and getting some production and high caliber play from the rest of the draft. If Hubbard can take a step forward, we have a plan if/when CMC goes down again. If Marshall finally wakes up, we have another serious WR threat. If we find some actual role for BC, that is a big win. If Tremble can establish himself as a more consistent pass catching threat and keep improving on his blocking, he might be a long term solution. If we can get basically ANYONE from the rest of that draft as a solid rotational player or even a starter, that's a home run. But we need at least 2-3 of those things to happen. If not.....ooof. That 2021 class is looking really bad.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, but getting into games and getting  meaningful time is completely different. A chunk of that PT was due to injuries or poor performances from players ahead of them.

From our 2020 guys, we need to see a clear improvement and the start of being a solid NFL professional. From our 2021 guys, we just need to see the incremental improvement that shows they are learning and progressing.

Brown definitely has a critical year coming. He has to show consistency and shore up his technique issues that lead to him getting out of position so much. If he can't get that accomplished, he's leaning bust at three years of starting experience. For YGM, we need to see him basically come in and establish himself as a starter or critical rotation guy. Establish yourself as the DE that should get the most reps on that side. Chinn we just need to see get better at coverage and understanding his role as a safety. If all those things happen, 2021 was a home run class. If none of them happen, it's not looking great.

For 2021, it's just about getting Horn on the field and getting some production and high caliber play from the rest of the draft. If Hubbard can take a step forward, we have a plan if/when CMC goes down again. If Marshall finally wakes up, we have another serious WR threat. If we find some actual role for BC, that is a big win. If Tremble can establish himself as a more consistent pass catching threat and keep improving on his blocking, he might be a long term solution. If we can get basically ANYONE from the rest of that draft as a solid rotational player or even a starter, that's a home run. But we need at least 2-3 of those things to happen. If not.....ooof. That 2021 class is looking really bad.

When you put it that way, I see a lot of IF's.  I have more faith in the 2020 class, but that may be misplaced.

This has been said ad nauseam, but the fact that young players didn't get time even when those in front of them were short of the mark is one of my major frustrations and really a turning point with me on Rhule. 

IMO, the worst case of knowing some large number of them are busts is better than not knowing.  If nothing else, the task at hand is known and we aren't trying to move forward with nearly the entire list being a question mark.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

When you put it that way, I see a lot of IF's.  I have more faith in the 2020 class, but that may be misplaced.

This has been said ad nauseam, but the fact that young players didn't get time even when those in front of them were short of the mark is one of my major frustrations and really a turning point with me on Rhule. 

IMO, the worst case of knowing some large number of them are busts is better than not knowing.  If nothing else, the task at hand is known and we aren't trying to move forward with nearly the entire list being a question mark.

1000% agree. We the fans don't get to see the practices nor film study nor any of the work these guys are putting in to get better.

So when you have a bunch of underperformed veteran players playing ahead of the guys you drafted, it's extremely frustrating as a fan. Are these guys not capable of playing? Do they just need more development? Is the coaching staff making good personnel evaluations? What exactly is the reason we aren't seeing these guys more?

Is the player evaluation a problem? Is the player development a problem?  Is standard roster bureaucracy the problem?

When we don't see these guys play as the team loses game after game, with veterans playing terrible....we have only questions and no answers. It sucks. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

1000% agree. We the fans don't get to see the practices nor film study nor any of the work these guys are putting in to get better.

So when you have a bunch of underperformed veteran players playing ahead of the guys you drafted, it's extremely frustrating as a fan. Are these guys not capable of playing? Do they just need more development? Is the coaching staff making good personnel evaluations? What exactly is the reason we aren't seeing these guys more?

Is the player evaluation a problem? Is the player development a problem?  Is standard roster bureaucracy the problem?

When we don't see these guys play as the team loses game after game, with veterans playing terrible....we have only questions and no answers. It sucks. 

 

Particularly when the season is lost.  I can write some of this stuff off in September, October, and early November.  Once the chances of going to the post season fly out the window, what is there to lose?

I can tolerate losing.  I've seen enough of it over the year both since I became a Panthers fan and long before.  But, in most cases that is buffered by learning something positive about somebody along the way.  Every now and then more gets learned from how players push forward (or not) when they are losing than when everything is clicking.

Last year, we learned nothing and in fact lost part of what we thought we knew from the year before.

But, I can still hear a past coach talking about "Lipshitz gives us the best chance to win"...even though he is awful and we don't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sgt Schultz said:

Particularly when the season is lost.  I can write some of this stuff off in September, October, and early November.  Once the chances of going to the post season fly out the window, what is there to lose?

I can tolerate losing.  I've seen enough of it over the year both since I became a Panthers fan and long before.  But, in most cases that is buffered by learning something positive about somebody along the way.  Every now and then more gets learned from how players push forward (or not) when they are losing than when everything is clicking.

Last year, we learned nothing and in fact lost part of what we thought we knew from the year before.

But, I can still hear a past coach talking about "Lipshitz gives us the best chance to win"...even though he is awful and we don't.

Yep. It literally makes zero sense what we did at the end of last season. It was just another in a long list of strikes against this coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...