Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carlos Dunlap Visiting Panthers


XClown1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I still can't see how people see this as a bad thing.  I mean unless his gets a dumb contract it should do nothing but improve this team.  Dunlap mixed in the rotation would help offset the loss of Reddick.  

Some of those against this, not all, but some, are the same crowd who want to get Rhule out "faster".  A move like this could help "Save Matt Rhule's ass."  Its the same people against trading for a vet QB.  They want to save the cap for the next coach and tank this year,  because we had 5 wins last year and they were expecting more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I still can't see how people see this as a bad thing.  I mean unless his gets a dumb contract it should do nothing but improve this team.  Dunlap mixed in the rotation would help offset the loss of Reddick.  

There are people who see this as a bad thing? In what galaxy would someone not like this

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at my own early chart, places of making room for this is cutting Hoskins or Ricci or the 3rd QB. Possibly the 7th LB, but I think we keep that many since we are a hybrid D. I would say 3rd QB. Walker hasn`t improved and if we are down to him, we can just pick up someone the same or better. However, we do have recent history of only keeping 4 DTs.

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pakmeng said:

It's YGMs responsibility to win reps not be handed them. Its year 3. Sink or swim. So now we have people arguing against depth and competition? We are talking about the Huddle though 

We are talking about another sh!t year, but go ahead and shoot for the stars bud.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FACT: Not winning the division, that would be the Brady and the Bucs.  PROBABLE: Not getting a wildcard, that would be a NFC West team and Central/East team.  So we are burning cap to get an extra win or two so Rhule can say there is progress.  On to year four of Tepper/Rhule and more negative cap space. Yippy!!!!!!

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

FACT: Not winning the division, that would be the Brady and the Bucs.  PROBABLE: Not getting a wildcard, that would be a NFC West team and Central/East team.  So we are burning cap to get an extra win or two so Rhule can say there is progress.  On to year four of Tepper/Rhule and more negative cap space. Yippy!!!!!!

Wrong. We are going to be in contention for the #1 seed in the NFC .. hate away - we will be

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

FACT: Not winning the division, That would be the Brady and the Bucs.  PROBABLE: Not getting a wildcard, that would be a NFC West team and Central team.  So we are burning cap to get an extra win or two so Rhule can say there is progress.  On to year four of Tepper/Rhule. Yippy!!!!!!

Yup and by adding a guy that doesn't need coaching. That's also why he wants Jimmy G or whoever, it would make it look like there was some amount of "progress" in his "process". In reality it's just Rhule saying a lot of words and hoping the players make him look good. We're already $30-35M over the cap next year, not sure why adding another $5M or so to help Rhule keep his job is a plus. Just delays the inevitable of him getting fired 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Yup and by adding a guy that doesn't need coaching. That's also why he wants Jimmy G or whoever, it would make it look like there was some amount of "progress" in his "process". In reality it's just Rhule saying a lot of words and hoping the players make him look good. We're already $30-35M over the cap next year, not sure why adding another $5M or so to help Rhule keep his job is a plus. Just delays the inevitable of him getting fired 

Gifting a guy his last substantial payday to get Rhule over the 5-win hump is exactly what we need.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ellis said:

 

I'm not doubting Dunlap still can get it done, my problem is it's a band aid on a gunshot wound. Yes, it will help somewhat in the short term, but what about down the road?  This team is in a long term rebuild and these one or two-year deals with FAs isn't going to get it done.  Hired mercenaries aren't in the long term interest of the organization.

FYI, I almost stopped in at the Ingles in Powersville to see you last week on the way home from work, but I had a hot dinner waiting on me.  If you are on location again around me, I'll pop in to say hi!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...