Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a weird few years it's been


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dumped Cam Newton...

Signed Teddy Bridgewater...

Signed (and kept) PJ Walker...

Traded for Sam Darnold...

Traded away Teddy Bridgewater...

Passed on the 2021 draft options...

Did everything in our power to stupidly pursue Deshaun Watson...

Drafted Matt Corral...

And today, Baker Mayfield.

I'm dizzy now 😖

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Dumped Cam Newton...

Signed Teddy Bridgewater...

Signed (and kept) PJ Walker...

Traded for Sam Darnold...

Traded away Teddy Bridgewater...

Passed on the 2021 draft options...

Did everything in our power to stupidly pursue Deshaun Watson...

Drafted Matt Corral...

And today, Baker Mayfield.

I'm dizzy now 😖

I’m still waiting for signings of Delhomme and Brian St. Pierre.  Gotta catch ‘em all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, there's swinging like Babe Ruth and there's swinging like Mighty Casey... 😕

Well, even the wind of whiffs feels good on these current hot summer days. 

I'd give us at least a middling chance to actually be competitive on the field this year, and if things go well, we'll be competitive in the win-loss column by 2023. We have at least one solid backup out of the three---uhh, four---and perhaps a long term starter with a little favor from the football gods.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You gotta keep swinging until you hit. That's about the most positive way I can spin it.

 

9 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I can appreciate the teams efforts to keep trying to get better. Brrdgewater, Darnold and Baker have all been big upside, low downside moves. 

 

Agree with these opinions above.  I'd rather see them continue to try within reason, and this move for Baker is reasonable.  Not sure how you can be mad....Corral wasn't ever going to be ready to start week 1 this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...