Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This right here is HUGE


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Baker's fall off occurs in the 4th quarter.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have any 4th qtr comebacks.  He does.  He has 6.  It looks like 2-3 a year is a good benchmark, so he's a bit south of that.

Watch out you are going to trigger a certain someone…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Watch out you are going to trigger a certain someone…

Yeah.  I do that.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/comebacks_active.htm

Anyway Baker is at 1.5 4th qtr combacks a year.   That is the same as Kyler Murray and Carson Wentz.  Of course its a lot better than Teddy and Sam.

Baker is his worst in the 4th quarter.  That doesn't mean he doesn't win games there. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SazmoRanger said:

Why do people keep comparing him to Darnold? Please stop. The people who didn’t want to trade for Baker don’t think Darnold is better. NOBODY, thinks that. Congrats, Baker is better than the worst starting QB in the league last year. 
 

Most people like myself just don’t want to settle for mediocrity and don’t believe Baker is an elite QB. You need that elite QB to win the Super Bowl in today’s NFL. Just because Sam sucks doesn’t mean we should’ve traded for Baker. 

The alternative was to throw a 3rd round rookie to the wolves.  This is the superior plan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Don't forget f'n Clete Blakeman. They couldn't win without him.

No one will ever convince me that game wasn't determined before the ball was ever snapped. No way were they going to let PM be 1-3 in SBs. If that had been TB12 instead of Cam half that defense would have been ejected. Manning losing to an upstart young star doing everything the NFL hated was never going to happen. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

100%  we have no plan

Actually you just don't like the plan.

If Hurney was still here, we'd be finishing up Teddy's contract this year. 

Fits plan is the same as Seattle's: keep throwing QB's at the wall until you find one.  Teddy was OK, but we felt he couldn't get us there.   Sam was a stinker.  Cam is done, unfortunately.  Now we're trying Baker. 

 It is a rocky road and hard on fans, and it is a very unconventional plan but it has had success at our GM's previous stop which is why it is happening here.  We also drafted a rookie to see if somethings there.

I was against the Baker trade, but its done.   He has  potential, and I'm not sure he won't become elite.  He's not perfect, but had a better rookie year than Allen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

No one will ever convince me that game wasn't determined before the ball was ever snapped. No way were they going to let PM be 1-3 in SBs. If that had been TB12 instead of Cam half that defense would have been ejected. Manning losing to an upstart young star doing everything the NFL hated was never going to happen. 

That’s 100% what happened. I wouldn’t even put it past being a subconscious biased against Cam and history of the game at the time and the whole “good ole boy” mentality.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...