Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

This year has nothing to do with the last 2. We have real coaches now.

Real coaches dont give up draft capital to draft a qb they say had a first round grade and make him 4rth string to prove some asinine point.  Look around the league and tell me what other teams are doing that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Real coaches dont give up draft capital to draft a qb they say had a first round grade and make him 4rth string to prove some asinine point.  Look around the league and tell me what other teams are doing that? 

Sure they do. How about Green Bay with Love or San Francisco with Lance.  What about Mahomes in KC.  I could go on but this is enough.  Fourth string or second string it often helps a qb to sit. Corral needs to sit and absorb those mental reps otherwise he is lost as you can see. He came from a simple college offense to a complex NFL offense Baker said took a lot to master and this is his fourth system. 

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It isn't hard to figure out. It means that his interest is on winning games now so the starters get all the reps. Corrals reps aren't important right now. It isn't bad coaching.  It is teaching a new offense to a bunch of guys allocating reps based on priority. When your job is on the line you don't worry about next year you focus on the present. Once Baker got here the importance of Corral playing right away went way down which was a good thing. I expect if Baker has a good year he will be resigned to a big contract. There will be plenty of time to develop Corral.

That sounds good in theory but when you add in that Darnold has taken the majority of the snaps with the first team it blows that out of the water. Nothing makes this coaching staff look like they have a clue what they are doing and if I'm betting the farm I'm betting they will be unemployed come December. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

That sounds good in theory but when you add in that Darnold has taken the majority of the snaps with the first team it blows that out of the water. Nothing makes this coaching staff look like they have a clue what they are doing and if I'm betting the farm I'm betting they will be unemployed come December. 

I haven't read that. I thought Baker and Darnold were evenly split.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Baker is our 1. Matt should be our 2, and Sam/PJ should be competing for 3. We know what Sam and PJ both are. Sam is in the NFL right now because of his draft position. PJ is in the NFL because of nepotism. Rhule is a college coach that's been exposed. 1000%

Corral has done nothing to earn that position at all. I would hate to see him start if Baker got hurt. It could be much worse than Darnold and that is saying something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

So even while acknowledging that more reps leads to better play, Rhule still defends not giving Corral enough reps and blames Corral for not looking like a superstar with three to four reps per practice.

Yeah, this guy is a clown 😖

Corral isnt going to play this season unless something crazy happens.  Hes also not going to be the backup unless they trade Darnold somehow soooo... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I must have missed something but Love, Lance and mahomes were 4rth string?

Second string,  fourth string. Whatever. Delhomme was third string in 2003 going into camp and we all know what happened.  No Corral is where he should be. At the bottom until he proves otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Corral isnt going to play this season unless something crazy happens.  Hes also not going to be the backup unless they trade Darnold somehow soooo... 

Exactly and that is a relief. Look at how everyone except Jones did as rookies last year. Corral playing this year would guarantee a top 3 pick and drafting another qb. If he sits we probably stick with him. So he is more likely to be here if he sits and doesn't play than if he does and disappoints.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panthers55 said:

Exactly and that is a relief. Look at how everyone except Jones did as rookies last year. Corral playing this year would guarantee a top 3 pick and drafting another qb. If he sits we probably stick with him. So he is more likely to be here if he sits and doesn't play than if he does and disappoints.

If he sits and we only win 7 games then its a moot point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...