Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots Joint Practice Day 1

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Campen?

I don't think you're giving Snow much credit.  He always seems to do better than expected with the talent we have. We have only seen a limited sample of our defense but IMO our defense is going to give us a chance to win games.   Our offense seemed to move the ball much, much better under McAdoo.  We'll have to wait and see how we start before I call that weak. 

I have absolutely 0 complaints about Phil Snow and this defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bruceleeroy Enthusiast

bruceleeroy

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Matt Rhule doesn't have this team prepared, again. Our "starter" isn't even ready. They forced this Baker thing but whenever Baker takes a baby step it's

excited american horror story GIF

 

but Sam is making completions actually moving the ball looking more ready every session. Sam is fools gold, we know that. Baker hasn't established himself as the clear leader either not with his play on the field.

Here we are with still no "starter" and two weak veterans.

You are the most uninformed uneducated person I have ever seen when it comes to Baker Mayfield.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Largely because the coach is a dumbass.

I really have no idea what he even does. He’s not an expert at anything football related. He’s not a defensive guru or an offensive mastermind. Literally what does he do aside from f*ck sh*t up and make dumbass decisions. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
coffee Community Regular

coffee

Posted
Posted

Mr Scot, you and I had a cordial and enjoyable disagreement in another thread.  With the same spirit, I'm going to answer these comments.  Bear in mind that I don't disagree about Rhule.  I'm just not at the point that I agree yet either.  I think there are circumstances that force me to go into year three with an open mind.

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

All of those are personnel based things, and I haven't been critical of our personnel or our roster.

Talk to me about coaching, about practice management, about depth chart decisions, things like that.

Defend to me having a "quarterback competition" to settle a question that was pretty obvious to everybody else.

Aside from the obvious "Competition brings out the best" view, Baker is known for the chip on his shoulder.  From what I've read, he's quite similar to Smitty and does drastically better when it isn't handed to him.  There is also the fact that we had yet to see what Darnold could do with a decent O-line.  Baker had an exceptional O-line in Cleveland.  Everyone has had their feelings on the matter, but I don't think we had a real opportunity to compare them until this competition.  I would handle this the same as Rhule did, but I would now pronounce it Mayfield's job.

Explain the idea that a guy who was drafted at #6 overall specifically to be the left tackle had to "earn it" when most other teams will just slot them in and give them the reps they need to start learning immediately.

Same principle as above.  The "earn it" mentality works wonders for both the new guy and the guy fighting to hold on to his spot.  Again, I'd do the same.

Talk to me about why we give camp and preseason reps to a quarterback who's not going to make the team over a guy we're supposed to be prepping for the future.

I actually don't understand the complaints here.  They've made it quite clear that they feel Corral can hopefully progress to be a QB1 after sitting a year.  They seem to be playing our QBs exactly as they should according to that view.  If he's going to hopefully not be playing this year, the main playing time should go to the ones who may be playing this year.  You say 'a QB who's not going to make the team,' but both Baker and Darnold spent a good portion of last year injured.  As much as we want to assume QB1 will be healthy all year, it is a must that we prepare.  What if Baker goes on IR after Friday's game?  It would be a horrible coaching decision to have given more reps to a rookie who won't take the field and little or none to the 2 QBs that have to fill in until Baker returns.

Bottom Line: I don't trust Matt Rhule. He has yet to give me any reason to do so.

Can he change that opinion? Sure, but it's got to come with wins, not optimism or speculation.

I agree with this statement.  We haven't seen enough to be able to trust him.  I just don't feel we've seen enough to write him off either.  If, for example, Teddy Bridgewater had gone to Denver and been magnificent, I'd think our QB issues might be coaching.  As it stands, I just think we haven't seen enough to know what he can do with a decent QB and a decent O-line.  

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Thanks to those that put what they were hearing and reading into the blow by blow on here.

I see what you did there - nice one 🤣

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If there's a downside to him, it's that the last two or three head coaches he's worked for have all been fired after one season with him.

Don't you give us that false hope like that, don't you dare...

(insert some insane mumbling about Jay-Z and seven years here)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Pass Rush

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • kungfoodude
      Pass Rush

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • Waldo
      Pass Rush

      By Waldo · Posted

      That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...