Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Patriots Gameday Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now that is an odd way to do it. If its just those two playing I would have assumed it would be for an entire half each. Just from a rhythm standpoint. 

I'm not sure a had coach who thinks you can run a two quarterback system in the regular season is going to have a very good understanding of "rhythm".

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now that is an odd way to do it. If its just those two playing I would have assumed it would be for an entire half each. Just from a rhythm standpoint. 

This only makes sense if they are getting Sam out of here and Walker/Corral are battling for the QB2 job

"Then the second part, and this was coach McAdoo's idea, and his perspective, as a backup quarterback, you have to be ready to go in the game at a moment's notice, and you have to be able to excel and play well without having much of a chance to warm up. This is our way of simulating that for them, where they have to warm up and get cooled down and go in there and be hot; that's how I see it."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

This only makes sense if they are getting Sam out of here and Walker/Corral are battling for the QB2 job

"Then the second part, and this was coach McAdoo's idea, and his perspective, as a backup quarterback, you have to be ready to go in the game at a moment's notice, and you have to be able to excel and play well without having much of a chance to warm up. This is our way of simulating that for them, where they have to warm up and get cooled down and go in there and be hot; that's how I see it."

There is a part of my brain that thinks "Good grief, he's not gonna stop till he finds some way to keep PJ Walker, is he?"

I'm trying really hard not to believe that but damn 😖

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not sure a had coach who thinks you can run a two quarterback system in the regular season is going to have a very good understanding of "rhythm".

I doubt he seriously plans to run a 2 qb system.  Baker would have to start turning the ball over a lot before he's benched. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I doubt he seriously plans to run a 2 qb system.  Baker would have to start turning the ball over a lot before he's benched. 

I would expect a similar arrangement as this in Week 1 of the regular season. Baker first and third quarters, Darnold second and fourth. Or Baker on first and third downs, Darnold on second and fourth if needed.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

This only makes sense if they are getting Sam out of here and Walker/Corral are battling for the QB2 job

"Then the second part, and this was coach McAdoo's idea, and his perspective, as a backup quarterback, you have to be ready to go in the game at a moment's notice, and you have to be able to excel and play well without having much of a chance to warm up. This is our way of simulating that for them, where they have to warm up and get cooled down and go in there and be hot; that's how I see it."

It appears that it may indeed be the case. It would be shocking if they outright cut Sam however and anointed PJ the backup position without head to head competition. 

I guess PJ is auditioning for the backup position after all.  I suppose Corral is just getting some live bullets action to see what he's made of.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...