Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule hate....

tarheelfan23

By tarheelfan23,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, frankw said:

If you want to say give him a chance because he's the head coach that's one thing. But if the main support of your argument is saying he can "coach" then you are expecting people to forget he is 3-9 in the division and watched his team get stomped by fired head coaches one of whom dumped on us with Daniel Jones.

Copy and pasting your own posts now? Should report you for spamming.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Veteran

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted

It’s wait and see mode regardless. Prior to hiring rhule, it was known that it takes about 3 years for his system to start working. 
 

If you made this thread to try and end negatively on a message board… good luck. That’s just the internet. 
 

For coaches, you have to win to stay in this league. Some coaches get it right the first time around, a lot of coaches get it right the second time around (if they even get to the second). So we will see, but it’s not looking good for our head coach. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted (edited)

tilting-at-windmills.jpg?fit=496,429&ssl
You're tilting at windmills dude.

There weren't that many Rhule haters after year one.  Getting Sam last year cost us 2-3 very winnable games and enraged the fan base.  If we had won 7-8 games we could have shown improvement and the playoffs would look more realistic this year.    Losing our best offensive weapon and 1st round draft pick to injury for  most of the season is not considered an excuse in these parts.  Now we are in a mode where anything  bad is attributed to Rhule and everything good is attributed to anyone else. 

Wins are the only thing that will change the narrative.  I hope we get some.

Edited by poundaway
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, tarheelfan23 said:

he also went out this offseason and signed a lot of damn good coaches.....

 

learning from mistakes....and its year 3...this is always his year

He went and signed these coaches because he was told he had to or he was getting fired. That's not growth. That's saving your own ass. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

It’s wait and see mode regardless. Prior to hiring rhule, it was known that it takes about 3 years for his system to start working. 
 

If you made this thread to try and end negatively on a message board… good luck. That’s just the internet. 
 

For coaches, you have to win to stay in this league. Some coaches get it right the first time around, a lot of coaches get it right the second time around (if they even get to the second). So we will see, but it’s not looking good for our head coach. 

What’s his system?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...