Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LOTR: The Rings of Power


Brooklyn 3.0
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Woo lordy! Two episodes down and I AM IN. That was fantastic. Top notch cinematography, great story, great score, actors I've never seen thus I can believe, good cliffhangers, charm, humor, action. I think this is going to be the next GoT.

Is it gory/sex or kids can watch it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

No sex, man! It's LOTR! No gore like in GoT, but there is killing. Some violence too. Kids might find it a bit too boring though at times. But they'll love the harfoots and dwarves!

Ok, sounds good.  I might let my 8 year old watch it.  He watched regular LOTR and loved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Ok, sounds good.  I might let my 8 year old watch it.  He watched regular LOTR and loved it.

It's pretty much spot on. Looks amazing. Most expensive TV series ever produced. I like the story a lot so far. They had to go off Tolkien's anectdotes or notes or whatever, instead of just copying an actual book so they obviously took some liberty to try things. Book nerds might be upset, but when there is no long form book to cover this era, per se, I don't see what there is to fuss about.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, finally got to sit down, watch and think on the two episodes.  First off, my point of reference is that of a guy who read The Hobbit, LOTR, and Silmarillion annually until I got hooked on GoT and other stuff.  I'm a BIG fan.  BIG BIG NERDY fan 😃

I'm completely hooked as well.  At the end of the day, it's a universe I LOVE that shaped me even to this day.  Is it going to be 100% accurate?  No, it shouldn't be.  It's an adaptation, which is great.  The process of adaptation isn't some kind of word for word nonsense angry internet fanboys cry about.  It's about making choices for your end game.  In this case, it's a monument to the legacy of Tolkien, Jackson and our own collective imaginations.

At first, when I saw how the story and Galadriel had been changed, I was like WTF?  Then I sat my entitled fanbutt down and had a quick chat.  It's more Middle Earth.  It's bringing Middle Earth to the 21st century.  it's bringing Middle Earth to more people.  After I slapped my internal fanboy, I was just engrossed.  

It looks like a billion dollar show.  The cast we've seen thus far is amazing.  You can tell that no expense in time or cash was spared.  I'm in love.  Will that remain?  I have no idea, but I'm so excited for this future.

Lady Desi is my favorite character so far.  She stole the scenes she was in, and it was wonderful.  The kids playing in the heads was hysterical.  Frankly, I love seeing the liveliness of the Dwarves since there was so little of it ever shown.

Even my 10 year old got into it, and he's been very much "I won't watch new things unless it's a cartoon" lately.  So there's that!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, just read an article about how Galadriel was in fact a total badass.  I have just forgotten.  From her days in the undying lands, she was a beast.  She also fought in the first kinslaying wars of the elves as the Teleri elven ships were stolen by Finrod and the other Noldori elves.  Yeah, she should be one of the greatest living elven warriors.  Jackson missed a cool opportunity there.

so my inner fanboy was wrong.  God that’s nice to put him down a bit more!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, d-dave said:

Oh, just read an article about how Galadriel was in fact a total badass.  I have just forgotten.  From her days in the undying lands, she was a beast.  She also fought in the first kinslaying wars of the elves as the Teleri elven ships were stolen by Finrod and the other Noldori elves.  Yeah, she should be one of the greatest living elven warriors.  Jackson missed a cool opportunity there.

so my inner fanboy was wrong.  God that’s nice to put him down a bit more!!!

Yeah, I don't know why so many people were in an uproar. When we saw her in the movies, she had to have been hundreds of years old. Maybe 400? 500? Of course she's just going to be chilling in her white robes. I'm shocked they haven't said anything negative about Elrond yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Yeah, I don't know why so many people were in an uproar. When we saw her in the movies, she had to have been hundreds of years old. Maybe 400? 500? Of course she's just going to be chilling in her white robes. I'm shocked they haven't said anything negative about Elrond yet.

Big Nerd Hat Time:

At the time of the Fellowship, Galadriel was about 8,000 years old.  She was born in Aman, the Undying Lands in the time of the Two Trees.  She was amongst the oldest and most powerful of all Elves living at the end of the Third Age.  She fought throughout the First and Second Ages.  She spent the last thousand or so years of of Third Age as the Lady of Lorien.

I just think angry kids of the internet are mad because they are always mad when their expectations aren't met.  The new character of Elrond(played by Robert Aramayo) has just enough smug that it's believable he could grow into the Hugo Weaving, stern, serious leader Elrond.  It's also a dude.  We all know how the internet handles strong females of any type!

I rewatched all of the preview trailers, and I am SO STOKED for the rest of the season!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just reread the Silmarrilion about a month ago to brush up on Middle Earth lore in anticipation for the show.  Think I'm gonna wait for all the episodes to be available so I can binge through the season.  Glad to be hearing good things about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...