Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers best draft vs. worst draft?


YourLastThought
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

Lafell was.....fine. 

Hardy had one flash in the pan season, assaulted a woman and threw her on his gun bed, sat for a year, paid her off, went to dallas and did nothing, and now spends his time rabbit punching toe tags in mma matches

hardy is nothing to hang a hat on

So an 11 sack season prior was just flash in the pan? He had two good seasons and was ascending prior.... Lafell was azz.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

2001 is the best hands down...

Morgan

Jenkins

Smith

Just to add

Wienkie was decent backup value and hung around after the rookie deal

Cooper was legally insane and a demon on ST. All you can ask form a 5th is decent STer and he was much better. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Imagine if we'd taken Blaine Gabbert like many wanted in 2011. That could've gone down as the worst draft class in the history of sports, period. Landing Cam was MASSIVE but the rest of the draft class was unbelievably bad.

 

It would have been in the top 50 no questions.....The kicker about it is Mcclain is STILL around to this day, he played 92 games only 12 came via blue and black.......Him and Nixon feel similar too..... But 2011 was also the draft in which the FIRST pick in 2nd round was the Edwards trade. fuging Armanti "man WRs suuure do run a LOT" Edwards for the 33rd overall pick......kill me now...

Cam first saved that draft class, then the panthers for 8 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Just to add

Wienkie was decent backup value and hung around after the rookie deal

Cooper was legally insane and a demon on ST. All you can ask form a 5th is decent STer and he was much better. 

Weinkie was set up to fail.  He was a solid backup in value, but thrust into a starter's role.  Can't expect a 4th rounder to be the face of a franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

So an 11 sack season prior was just flash in the pan? He had two good seasons and was ascending prior.... Lafell was azz.

Dont know if fitzs view on hardy is cloudy, its hard to overlook tossing a woman on bed of guns after smackin her around....cannt blame. But the 6th best comment is crazy talk, guy was peppers-prime-lite.

Lafell was not ass, he was an average #2 WR with staying power. Played in 125 games, 31 TDs, and 5k yards when it was allll run focus. Went to the Pats and had his best year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

Weinkie was set up to fail.  He was a solid backup in value, but thrust into a starter's role.  Can't expect a 4th rounder to be the face of a franchise. 

Yea unfair hand, but he made the most of his talents. Still remember one of my bros- "we drafted a guy thats already balding?!?!?".

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst - 09, 16, 11

09 was a shitshow of the highest proportions. We traded away the future first then traded another future first for Brown. The only saving grace was Captain Munnerlyn in the 7th

16 - The only saving grace is Bradberry, and he's really good. The rest are just bad. Worley and Butler seem to stick around NFL Rosters each year but neither were worthy of where they were drafted.

If Cam wasn't in that 11 draft, it would hands down be the worst and he is the only saving grace. The fact we had the first pick in every round by default and produced such garbage should not be overlooked.

Best - 01, 17, 07

In 01 our first three picks were Morgan, Jenkins, and Smitty respectively. Can't really beat that in terms of talent.

07 we got Beason, Kalil and Johnson all in one year, which was another great one.

Say what you want about Gettleman, but 17 was his magnum opus where 3/7 are pro bowl caliber players (CMC, Moton, Butker) and all but 1 is still on an NFL roster and contributing 5+ years after the fact. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Worst - 09, 16, 11

09 was a shitshow of the highest proportions. We traded away the future first then traded another future first for Brown. The only saving grace was Captain Munnerlyn in the 7th

16 - The only saving grace is Bradberry, and he's really good. The rest are just bad. Worley and Butler seem to stick around NFL Rosters each year but neither were worthy of where they were drafted.

If Cam wasn't in that 11 draft, it would hands down be the worst and he is the only saving grace. The fact we had the first pick in every round by default and produced such garbage should not be overlooked.

Best - 01, 17, 07

In 01 our first three picks were Morgan, Jenkins, and Smitty respectively. Can't really beat that in terms of talent.

07 we got Beason, Kalil and Johnson all in one year, which was another great one.

Say what you want about Gettleman, but 17 was his magnum opus where 3/7 are pro bowl caliber players (CMC, Moton, Butker) and all but 1 is still on an NFL roster and contributing 5+ years after the fact. 

I have said some nasty things about Gettleman so, in fairness, I need to acknowledge that you are correct about him having one of our best drafts.

It's quite painful to me to have to accept that two of our best drafts were by Seifert and Gettleman.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...