Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Team Stat Rankings through Week 1


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

OFFENSE 

Total offense : 28th 

Passing offense : 20th

Rushing offense : 31st

Points per Game : 10th 

DEFENSE 

Total defense : 17th

Passing defense : 2nd 

Rushing defense : 31st 

Points allowed per game : 26th

Turnover deferential : 27th

 

Ugly stuff. The only decent rakings we have are points per game and passing defense, and you could argue those are only high as a result of playing catch up and getting obliterated by the run so the browns didnt have to pass a bunch. 

Was kinda surprised we weren't last in rushing defense apparently that's the Titans. 

OFFENSE PLAYER STATS LEADERS

QB Baker Mayfield : 16/27 passing, 235 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 84.6 passer rating

RB Christian McCaffrey : 10 rush, 33 rush yards, 3.3 YPC, 1 TD

WR Robby Anderson : 5 receptions, 8 targets, 102 receiving yards, 20.4 YPR, 1 TD


DEFENSE

Damien Wilson : 1 sack (he has the teams only sack, the whole team is ranked somewhere near the bottom of the league only having one sack. IIRC Pitt and Buffalo lead the league in sacks with 7 total)

Xavier Woods : 10 tackles, Brian Burns, 8 tackles , Henry Anderson, 2 tackles for loss. 

0 INTS . O forced fumbles.

LOL 

 

Baker had bit of an ugly day with all the fumbles and that bad pick and the overall innaccuracy, but stats wise he looks kinda average if you don't take the fumbles into account (they don't show up on his stats line).

McCaffrey didnt have that many carries but even being said, 3.3 is rather low for him. But if you remember back to his rookie year when he was splitting carries with Jonathan Stewart he got very similar numbers out of similar work volumes of carries so in that sense it may not be too surprising. 

Robbie that was mosltly off that one pass in busted coverage but its encouraging at least.  If you remember his first two seasons he was also off to a big start and he subsequently disappeared last year, so keep an eye out for that. 

 

 

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The passing defense is heavily skewed because the Browns were not exactly starting Mahomes.  Our rushing offense was 31st because of our (curious) choice to not run the football, especially early.  Both of those numbers will probably bounce more toward the middle.

Unfortunately, the rushing defense may not move much.

It's one game, so I am not going to draw many conclusions and certainly not many beyond decisions and performances in one game.  The one to watch, IMO, is turnover differential.  Being 27th right now means next to nothing, other than the fact we didn't force any.  Had the one we did get stood, the entire outcome and how the game unfolded from there may have changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There was context to last year's Total Defense ranking too, but people kept ignoring it 😕

Yeah last year Sam constantly turned it over or went 3 and out.  If they have a short field, they can't get as many yards.  Also they spent the last quarter just running the ball to end the game.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They had 8 sacks and we had 0. Ugh, Riddick may just indeed be missed.

Looking for droped passes. I remember 2 for the Browns but wanted to see how that played into the passing game and pass D. Couldn't find it tho.

 

They were officially credited with 4 sacks. Myles Garret lead the team with 2 sacks with 4 other Cleveland defenders recording a 0.5 sack

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...