Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great offensive breakdown


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

damn it damn it damn it. That Browns defense got so lucky against us. We missed so many TD plays. We should have a had a 40 burger on them. I really hope Baker and the coaching staff seee what we all see in these videos. The opportunities are there!

Baker has had a habit of missing open receivers in the past…

I really hope DJ doesn’t become his new OBJ

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Baker has had a habit of missing open receivers in the past…

I really hope DJ doesn’t become his new OBJ

yea me too. That video shows some pretty egregious plays tho.  I watched it earlier this year when we were talking about acquiring Baker. There are some plays that do leave you scratching  your head while others you are like "yeah okay mr content creator.... 🙄"

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

damn it damn it damn it. That Browns defense got so lucky against us. We missed so many TD plays. We should have a had a 40 burger on them. I really hope Baker and the coaching staff seee what we all see in these videos. The opportunities are there!

The real question then becomes, will reps help this, or is this just who Baker is?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

If Brady C plays like he did week 1, he will be a pro bowler this year. He was an absolute beast on Sunday. 

He looked solid as hell out there. Some of the rageaholics in here were saying he wasn't strong enough to be a guard, but uh... dude looked like the best OL not named Moton (who had his share of struggles with Clowney, but he also had his successes as well!)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job, TheCasillas

The OL is probably the most encouraging part of our team right now.  A lot of people were (stupidly) declaring Ickey a bust because MG was a mad man, but MG is pretty much always a mad man.  It was his first game against a beast....what did we think was going to happen?  And let's face it: our OL has not been a source of encouragement for a loooong time.

A lot of us have been hoping Shi would step up.  Let's hope they use him.

We know Mayfield works well with play action, yet we did little to set that up.  That is game planning.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Good job, TheCasillas

The OL is probably the most encouraging part of our team right now.  A lot of people were (stupidly) declaring Ickey a bust because MG was a mad man, but MG is pretty much always a mad man.  It was his first game against a beast....what did we think was going to happen?  And let's face it: our OL has not been a source of encouragement for a loooong time.

A lot of us have been hoping Shi would step up.  Let's hope they use him.

We know Mayfield works well with play action, yet we did little to set that up.  That is game planning.

its funny bc we ran a lot of play action plays, the Browns just didnt bite. It's possible its due to the fact we just didnt hand it off much, ha. My only defending statement there is that most of the botched snaps were running plays. So that was 3-5 less run plays we were able to run.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You have been on fire lately.  There aren't many times my opinions change about something in the game, but you have done it several times lately.  Always nonbiased and pure analytical without any name calling or talking down to anyone.  Keep up the good work!  

You do realize he will probably be driven off the board and maybe the entire internet for that approach.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Icege said:

1st play of the game where Clowney deflected the pass to Robbie happened because of one of Elflein's "positive" plays where he knocked the DT Corbett was engaged with over into the back of Moton's legs.

Kind Of Reaction GIF by Bounce

Im not sure knocking over a defensive player should ever be declared a negative play. It didnt help Moton, but Elf's job there is to hit the closest man since he didnt have anyone in front of him. He knocked over the DT and the DT fell over into Clowney and Moton. 

I cant think of what else you would ask of Elf in that situation...

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

Does somebody need to point out to Monty that Clowney has Moton in Baker's lap during the throw and was what forced Baker to get it out?

Don't get me wrong, bad throw, but how are we going to say that he came off of DJ too early when Clowney's got a paw in his face?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Calling carrier for getting punched in the nose just to keep us from a 5 on 3
    • I just mean it’s always offsetting in that situation.  I didn’t realize they called another penalty
    • And as I asked this again before, what goes into PFF's man open %, as I know you've brought that stat up before. Is that just the number of routes he gets open at any point during the route, or is it calculated on targets and if he was open when the ball got to him. Because like I pointed out so many times in the lead up to the draft, a big reason it was harder for him to get separation against man was because he not only had his man on him, but he was double or triple teamed on the majority of his routes this past year.  Just because of that alone, it was easier for him to get open against zone coverage where he could find holes and sit in them. Also, again, as been discussed so many times, his QB's play this year was awful, and lots of times his contested catches were due to him not delivering the ball on time when T-Mac got open.  Or just times he got open but wasn't targeted for whatever reason. So just using that stat as a way to say he struggles to get open against man is more likely than not, disingenuous. Hell, it's a PFF stat that you're using against him, yet at the same time, PFF absolutely loves him, he was their 4th overall player.   I posted this clip on here a week or so ago of the T-Mac vs Hunter game in 2023, where the anti T-Mac guys like to say Hunter shut him down.  But numerous times in this video you see T-Mac create tons of separation from Hunter but the ball wasn't thrown his way, plus a clear PI that wasn't called (and the one that was). https://x.com/4MR_Fetti/status/1918262063660454227 The "he can't separate" narrative is way overblown and become something more myth than reality.  No, he's not an elite separator like some of the quick twitch WRs, but he's so much better than the haters here like to say.
×
×
  • Create New...