Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think Matt Rhule gets one more game


PhillyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

You don't have to worry about tanking, this team is going to give up if they drop another one.  This team will be lucky to get 5 wins.

You’re not wrong about having failed coaches, but you’re also looking at it through one single lense. On the flip side, firing rhule midseason accomplishes other things. 1) it shows the fan base that this isn’t acceptable 2) it shows the players that you’re committed to change for the better. Those guys are 100% going to check out if they lose 1-2 more games 3) you can salvage a bad taste in current players mouths for having 0 accountability at the coaching level. There’s a lot that goes into the decision. It’s not as black and white as “we having a bunch of poo coaches on the staff so what does it matter anyways.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

I agree he gets one more game. The last two were winnable . This one was especially possible. We should have won by two TDs with this roster.

It seems like when one unit steps up the other falters.

You might be giving this roster too much credit.

Edited by ickmule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to see them breaking out of their slump next week. Lattimore may be suspended which should be a plus. Winston has broken bones in his back but they played him anyway and he did Winston things with 3 interceptions in the 4th. It might be better for them if they start Dalton. Rhule might even be on equal ground, or close, with Dennis Allen. Our oline better bring the A-game and be ready for a rough time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...