Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s talk some Ickey at LT


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Why would you do that? How does that help Iky get better at LT? We aren’t a playoff team keep him there. He’s not Slater but maybe he’s like Andrew Thomas. People left him for dead and he was really good after his rookie year.

It’s funny to see all the complaints in preseason about his lack of snaps with the first team (he never played G in preseason) and now I’ve seen multiple posts about moving him to G now to help him develop.

Keep him at LT and let him keep getting better there.

Wrong. That is how you develop him. Needs to learn the speed of the game. Remember Ryan Kalil didn’t play center his first year. He played guard. He isn’t ready for full time LT duty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

😂 Ok coach. How many of the recent T 1st rounders played guard year one and tackle year two? Exactly, you are talking out your ass. He’s played every snap in preseason and games at LT and you think we should switch him to LG and that will help? Great plan. He hasn’t even been awful by any stretch.

Also, you are wrong on Kalil anyway. He started only 3 games in 2007 and all 3 were at C. He didn’t play G his rookie year and then switch to C his second, he just only started 3 total games. You might be thinking Gross, but even he played T his rookie year, not G.

I am right here. I’m Tied in pretty close to college players that played oline and this is their consents as well. He isn’t ready but at LG he can learn pass pro while still playing close to his natural position.   After a year he can then slide over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Even with the mistakes 10x better than Erving.. Baker had time today.. The Oline wasn't the problem the coaching is..

Wait what? You really think Baker had time today? Did we watch the same fuging game? Dude was running for his life damn near every play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

In hindsight, although a lot of those plays he made looked really goofy and sometimes didn't pan out, I think Daniel Jones handled those pressures 1000x better than Baker in that he evaded the pressure and then would try to reset to wait as long as possible for a receiver to come open; sometimes they didnt, and he ended up throwing something horrible or just throwing it away a the last second.  Whereas Baker would evade the pressure and immediately started up field on a scramble, almost every time.  Those 3 and 4 yard gains ultimately are inconsequential.  Jones had multiple big conversions off the same broken plays by waiting for a pass.  

But again, I'm going to believe part of this is still getting comfortable in the offense, but even more so, especially on the off-schedule plays, it's a lack of reps and chemistry with the receivers, imo.

Again, it’s Rhules fuging retarded QB contest in TC. God I cannot wait until he’s gone. Killing us at every single opportunity. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

Rhule sucks but damn, Mayfield is a 5th year starting vet. His reaction to pressure has nothing to do with the QB contest. Same reason why Darnold was so likely to fail, hence a stupid trade by us. Mayfield isn’t. Some rookie. His overthrow of Smith when he was wide open had nothing to do with Rhule. He was just very inaccurate even with little pressure.

Mayfield/McCaffrey are the only reason these games have been close-ish. He is an average QB which is a major upgrade from what we have had the last two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, joemac said:

Wait what? You really think Baker had time today? Did we watch the same fuging game? Dude was running for his life damn near every play. 

Yes!! You obviously didn't watch this game.. Baker had more time then any Panthers QB had the last 5 years.. The Oline is better.  Playcalling and coaching isn't..

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Rhule sucks but damn, Mayfield is a 5th year starting vet. His reaction to pressure has nothing to do with the QB contest. Same reason why Darnold was so likely to fail, hence a stupid trade by us. Mayfield isn’t. Some rookie. His overthrow of Smith when he was wide open had nothing to do with Rhule. He was just very inaccurate even with little pressure.

You’re cherry picking one play that even had the announcers questioning whether Smith fuged up or not. Baker has not been good. But he’s not had much help either.

Edited by joemac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Yes!! You obviously didn't watch this game.. Baker had more time then any Panthers QB had the last 5 years.. The Oline is better.  Playcalling and coaching isn't..

Lol ok. They were all over his ass all game. I guess we need to wait to see what the tape says. Again. Baker was not good. But he had zero help either. 

Edited by joemac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Yes!! You obviously didn't watch this game.. Baker had more time then any Panthers QB had the last 5 years.. The Oline is better.  Playcalling and coaching isn't..

Him having more time than any QB in the last 5 years isn’t saying much. Our OL went from an F to a D-. Baker was running all over the place.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...