Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hard Knock Life -current status of Panthers


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

told you to message it to me.  my inbox is empty. 

I figured you didn't do it after your boy Ben McAdoo has come out even worse than Joe Brady LMAO

My in box is empty.

Anyway, you were right, McAdoo's offense looks as bad as Brady's so far, but Baker started game one.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, poundaway said:

@CRA  Here's your avatar again:

 

 

You should be missing Joe Brady vs what we have now.  Joe Brady got more out of our offense with Sam Darnold than McAdoo is getting out of our offense with Baker.   Brady got even more out of our offense w/ Teddy vs Mcadoo w/ Baker.   And Baker is clearly the best QB of them all. 

I'll be happy to wear the new profile picture as a declaration that I was right and you were wrong.   Joe Brady wasn't the primary problem.  That's Matt Rhule.  The dude still here.    

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yea thats just insane.  Hard to say whats worse.  Unbelievable really.

It’s a complete lack of killer instinct. A complete inability to keep your foot on the gas. Complete inability to put teams away, and a team that doesn’t have a single clue as to how to win games. It starts and end with Rhule and his “culture”. 🤦 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

You should be missing Joe Brady vs what we have now.  Joe Brady got more out of our offense with Sam Darnold than McAdoo is getting out of our offense with Baker.   A much better QB. 

I'll be happy to wear the new profile picture as a declaration that I was right and you were wrong.   Joe Brady wasn't the primary problem.  That's Matt Rhule.  The dude still here.    

LOL

Whatever makes you feel better.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

LOL

Whatever makes you feel better.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

It's just straight up facts.  You seem to like skipping past that. 

McAdoo is getting less offensive production out of our O than Brady did.  And Joe Brady wasn't good. 

All the talk you do, why you running from this discussion.   You dug your heels in deep to McAdoo would be our savior from Joe Brady. 

So just say it.  What WAS and IS the primary problem with the Panther O? It's starts with M. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

It's just straight up facts.  You seem to like skipping past that. 

McAdoo is getting less offensive production out of our O than Brady did.  And Joe Brady wasn't good. 

All the talk you do, why you running from this discussion.   You dug your heels in deep to McAdoo would be our savior from Joe Brady. 

So just say it.  What WAS and IS the primary problem with the Panther O? It's starts with M. 

Meh.  You're comparing apples to oranges.

Joe Brady couldn't score a single touchdown against the Giants last year.

When we have the season average for McAdoo, then we'll compare to Brady's season average.

In the mean time, I will maintain that McAdoo HAS had success as an OC before in NY, and Brady NEVER has.

Has McAdoo sucked so far with the Panthers?  Yeah, pretty much.  Its early to say Brady was a better OC for the Panthers.

But its awesome to argue with you about Brady atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In a perfect world he’d play out his contract and if he looks great you can tag or extend him. But I wouldn’t offer more than a third. And I wouldn’t extend up front 
    • I have already seen him mocked to 7. 
    • I am not endorsing or rejecting.. just commenting. NYG GM Schoen and Morgan are like, vacation buds. Did the Burns trade already.  If we had interest it should be do-able. One year rental? Could be cheap. But it would need to be. Maybe a player could go back to them. More than that? Like trade for and extend him? I don’t know enough about him to really say about that. What LG just said sheds some light.    In a general sense, we have done well with our late rounders but the reason for that may apply less going forward. Tillis referenced this as well in his combine interview the other day. When you have holes everywhere it is easy to fill them with a draft pick, but once you have gotten things to a certain level that changes. At that point maybe a late round pick doesn’t upgrade your team like it did n previous seasons.  Hence the low picks become less impactful for us, there is less utility. Which could play into them being more willing to use them in a trade. 
×
×
  • Create New...