Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Team Played For Their Coach Today


Daddy_Uncle
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

There's a reason the Jaguars actually look competent and currently smashing the Chargers with basically the same roster from last year. Hmm, wonder what changed?

Bad teams become good when you have a good coach step in and it doesn't take years to accomplish it. The effect is drastic and quick.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

You and Zod are the two biggest dipshits on the board. 

There were folks doing taking down names and shouting at skeptics when we were 3-0 this time last year too. It was fun to revisit those threads later in the year and it will be fun to repeat that again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Bad teams become good when you have a good coach step in and it doesn't take years to accomplish it. The effect is drastic and quick.

A perfect point was when Shula left the Panthers. You saw an immediate change in how Cam Newton approached the game and it was for the better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

The thing is I'm not going to ban someone for insulting me or disagreeing with me. Ive been wrong a lot in my life and I've probably deserved some insults along the way. 

Far as i member youve always been a solid janny, top 3 all-time huddle-wise for sure. Thanks for your service and I hope zob buys you a new mop soon!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Coaches make sure their players are prepared for the game. 

Coaches make sure they have the right plan for the players to win.

Coaches make sure the right players are on the field.

Coaches make sure that their players are in the best situation to win.

Coaches make sure that players have a plan that adapts to situations.

Coaches make their players the best they can be so they can win. 

Rhule and his staff fails at all of this. If the players aren't doing their job, that's in the coaching staff.... ultimately it falls on Rhule.

 

See the problem on this board is all in this post. We assume that our staff doesn’t do these things because we base all of these things on the final outcomes. We don’t see what happens during the prep week. We don’t see what happens during halftime. We don’t see anything that goes on in the meeting rooms or between players. We view poor performance and outcomes on coaching prep, adjustments, etc. Sometimes it’s as easy as making one more play. Example: If Horn picks Winston or Shaq picks Winston we potentially prevent a score or score ourselves. Last week: if burns keeps contain and gets a sack the giants don’t score a TD drive, we win the game. Coaches coach. Players play. It’s that simple. Winston has been in NO for 2.5 years. Baker has been here 3 months, and split starter reps with Darnold during camp. We’ll figure it out. All these people here using Cincinnati as an example before have shut the fug up. They are exactly where we are. Chill and be a fan, or just pick the yearly winner.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rayzor said:

The thing is I'm not going to ban someone for insulting me or disagreeing with me. Ive been wrong a lot in my life and I've probably deserved some insults along the way. 

Not the disagreement the insult but that's completely fair am I allowed to use that one on the certainly obvious posters I disagree with? 😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
    • Cooter was a good dude for sure. 
    • We both been here about the same amount of time. Whatever happened to Livermush? I know Cooter passed aways years ago...and so many others?
×
×
  • Create New...