Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade deadline


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

No, you're ignoring the basic message that I've circled back to time and time again for pedantic reasons to try and 'win' an argument without actually addressing the point. It's annoying, it's some nerd poo. The Panthers could have had a quarterback prospect had they actually had tried to acquire draft capital and looked beyond the current regular season. They did not, instead they traded capital to win a nominal number of games.

You still don't want to address it or anyone that's relating to it. You've torpedoed the entire thread with this bullshit.

I dont think anyone has particpated to our back and forth in this thread, so I can't agree it has torpedo'd. Also, i dont think you circled back to any message, this is actually the most you typed about your origninal convo in our entire debate.

 

Now that you have gottent this off your chest..... which QB should we have built capital and traded for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I dont think anyone has particpated to our back and forth in this thread, so I can't agree it has torpedo'd. Also, i dont think you circled back to any message, this is actually the most you typed about your origninal convo in our entire debate.

 

Now that you have gottent this off your chest..... which QB should we have built capital and traded for?

I just stated it again in the previous message, and now you're pivoting to another argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it's already been posted, but Glazer tweeted that FOs around the league will start calling us to see what's available as they suspect we will want to maximize draft picks and assets moving forward with a rebuild.  I don't agree with this approach, but I could understand it with someone like CMC or Robby because of their contracts, them bring able to help a contender, and the likelihood that they won't be here very long after this season anyway. Anyone other than that, I'm not really looking to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

Don't know if it's already been posted, but Glazer tweeted that FOs around the league will start calling us to see what's available as they suspect we will want to maximize draft picks and assets moving forward with a rebuild.  I don't agree with this approach, but I could understand it with someone like CMC or Robby because of their contracts, them bring able to help a contender, and the likelihood that they won't be here very long after this season anyway. Anyone other than that, I'm not really looking to move.

as @Toomershas explained to me trading both would take some serious gymnastics in regards to our cap.  Hopefully he can in here and let us know how it could work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

as @Toomershas explained to me trading both would take some serious gymnastics in regards to our cap.  Hopefully he can in here and let us know how it could work

yea we only have a few tradeable assets. Luckily there are very few players that are "we have to trade these players or we are fuged" type of scenarios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

nevermind then, It's obvious you don't want to have a constructive conversation. Noted.The Big Lebowski Whatever GIF

I don't have to have a "constructive conservation" as I've already made my main statement. It's there, if you think what you're doing to poke holes in my opinion is worth it, it's up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

conversation* 

thanks for calling out my typo.

See this is what I'm saying. Some nerd poo. You're wasting my time with checking a notification, and everyone else's, reading a post that has nothing to do with anything, all because you want a win. Woohoo, you got me on a autocorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...