Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks/Holcomb Hype


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

He was also terrible as our DC.  I think the guy is at his level as a position coach.  There is nothing wrong with that.  He seems like a good dude who connects well with the players . . . but just not more than that.

#2 Overall, top ten points allowed,rush D  and almost every other metric 1st in sacks? 

 

You got him mixed up with that idiot after him Eric Washington.... derp

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

He was also terrible as our DC.  I think the guy is at his level as a position coach.  There is nothing wrong with that.  He seems like a good dude who connects well with the players . . . but just not more than that.

I think you mixed up Eric Washington for Wilks 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

I think you mixed up Eric Washington for Wilks 

Also, in Arizona he had to work with the combo of Rosen at QB and Keim at GM, brutal stuff. Not sure if he’s a good HC or not, but hard to fault him for the Arizona fiasco.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

I agree with you on playing closer to the LOS as opposed to playing more in space, which was never his strength. Playing LB full time would not be a good long-term career move for him IMO. And unnecessary with the depth we currently have there.

Should really watch Chinn in his rookie year again. Luvu has developed greatly which is awesome and gives us a good problem to have. Chinn just can't be dropped back he's a waste back there. His 6'3" stronk ass needs to be poppin off at the LoS regardless of what he is listed at position wise. This is the era of hybrids like TE/WR and S/LB, C/S, RB/WR, etc. so it isn't a big deal as long as he's used correctly which I think Wilks is going to do.

 

(I also can't add any more pie today for some reason or i'd have put one on your post)

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Martin said:

Also, in Arizona he had to work with the combo of Rosen at QB and Keim at GM, brutal stuff. Not sure if he’s a good HC or not, but hard to fault him for the Arizona fiasco.

Yeah it was so fast we didn't even get a chance to actually tell. It would be so cool if it works out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh it's addition by subtraction. My only expectations is that the players should be put in a better position to succeed in game...at least on D.  

I don't think the wins change much this year or that Wilks is a long term answer. We still have a McAdoo problem and Wilks was never more than a good DB coach with 1 year as a DC and HC. Just added basic stability and not Rhule's erratic BS along with a chance to see guys who Rhule wouldn't play for whateverfugging reasons. 

Watching Rhule's guys have meltdowns if they can't get their behinds in gear will be another positive. Time to cull the herd of overpaid underachievers that were on that bus to nowhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...