Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith said players have reached out to him on what to do…..


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

The players just want to play. I seriously doubt anyone in the locker room is a Rhule advocate, they just want stability and clear direction from the leadership at their workplace like any employees. Everything's uncertain now so it wouldn't surprise me if this makes the guys nervous.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJ is locked in with his contract, so he'll be here, but it's still very likely it was him.  

That being said, I fully expect a ton of stories to come out now about Rhule...  these players are coached up on how to handle media and avoid controversy from HS on nowadays.  No matter how they personally felt about him, they were just trying to toe the company line and get through week to week.  Now they're not bound to him and I expect a lot of the issues are going to come out publicly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

And?

 

42 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

Post it so we can discuss it 

Intended to but had to step away for a few minutes. I see someone else now has.

32 minutes ago, Tbe said:


With Rhule out of the league forever, I expect the stories to come fast.

Same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

Wouldn’t be surprised if it’s burns. 
 

burns doesn’t have a new contract and DJ does. 

That's prolly the best candidate for this quote.  I said despite the contract DJ was still a possibility because Smitty has been a bit of a direct mentor to him.  But, honestly, with the wave of news that we've gotten today, and in the manner in which these events have unfolded, Burns makes a ton of sense...  mainly, because those Twitter rumors from the "insider" seem to be confirmed more and more with each piece of news - such as the Wilks/Snow beef.  Part of the beef they said was due to how the defensive players were being used, and it came along with the bit that Burns was likely going to leave when his contract was up because of how he was being used.

Makes a ton of sense now.  I'm hoping Wilks and Holcomb will use him in a way that encourages him to stay.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...