Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the 2022 roster Rhule built better than the 2019 roster that Rhule inherited?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

You have to keep in mind not only the names, but where they were/are in the stage of their career.  The Cam he inherited was not the Cam of 2015.  Olsen and Luke were putting out on the 18th holes of their careers. 

True, but sadly they were still better then that anyone the team has had play their positions since including Cam's return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easily better now than what Rhule inherited. The only place 2019 is easily better is LB and TE (and our LB corp isn't bad, just compared to Luke I mean come on). QB was slightly better in 2019, but Baker/Sam isn't that much lower than 2019 Cam as much as it pains me to say. 

Our next coach has a legit roster to work with and a high pick to draft his QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Because that was Ron's last year and Rhule started building his roster in 2020.

Biggest problem there is no one knew how to go about rebuilding or building something properly in the NFL. 

No rebuild involves dumping poo tons of money and draft capital into busted vet QBs, making your RB the highest paid RB in the NFL, trading away draft picks for whatever, renting win now players for a year, etc.  That’s what happened under Matt Rhule. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Easily better now than what Rhule inherited. The only place 2019 is easily better is LB and TE (and our LB corp isn't bad, just compared to Luke I mean come on). QB was slightly better in 2019, but Baker/Sam isn't that much lower than 2019 Cam as much as it pains me to say. 

Our next coach has a legit roster to work with and a high pick to draft his QB

Cam won more games in 2020 than Sam and Baker most likely will win combined in Carolina. 

and the next HC is only inheriting Matt Corral.  No one else is under contract here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Biggest problem there is no one knew how to go about rebuilding or building something properly in the NFL. 

No rebuild involves dumping poo tons of money and draft capital into busted vet QBs, making your RB the highest paid RB in the NFL, trading away draft picks for whatever, renting win now players for a year, etc.  That’s what happened under Matt Rhule. 

Which is funny when you remember that he was hired because of his skills as a "program builder".

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, CRA said:

Cam won more games in 2020 than Sam and Baker most likely will win combined in Carolina. 

and the next HC is only inheriting Matt Corral.  No one else is under contract here. 

 

I don't really know what point you're trying to make here. Like I said in my original post, Cam in 2019 was slightly better than what we have now. So yes it makes sense he would win more games with arguably the best HC of all time in Belichick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...