Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ADAM SCHEFTER: Panthers listening to Christian McCaffrey trade offers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Nobody is going to give multiple first round picks for cmc. If they do they’re stupid.

If we got a late first we should consider that a win.

If I was the bills, I give about whatever panthers wanted. 2 1st sure. 2 1sts and some mids, sure. 2 1sts and some mids and a couple role players, sure. Im not even a big CMC fan either...

CMC with Allen, bills could cut their punter. Plus go ahead and start engraving a B on the SB trophy.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

If I was the bills, I give about whatever panthers wanted. 2 1st sure. 2 1sts and some mids, sure. 2 1sts and some mids and a couple role players, sure. Im not even a big CMC fan either...

CMC with Allen, bills could cut their punter. Plus go ahead and start engraving a B on the SB trophy.... 

I mean I hope they do give us 2 1sts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, frankw said:

Not even memes. Just random photos of eeyore and calling people wet blankets.

Its been a rough five years as panthers fans, we all are in some level of fan frustration. That maybe a way hes trying to help you lower you levels. I know a year of complaining has done little good for the huddle. I rarely complain, but join a few of the crybabing sessions, it was good to get some of that out. But daily, monthly, and now yearly?? Thats like hearing someone complaining about a restaurant that they always go to.... "I hate this place", pulls into parking spot.... 

Edited by Basbear
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After this season , you lose Darnald , Baker , and possibly PJ.   You only have Corral left .  If you trade with Washington you could get a top 10 pick and Sam Howell who would compete with Corral and either a vet QB or another drafted QB .  Either way you have possibilities .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...