Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our team sucks. Our fuging horrible owner likes ketchup on his steak...


Proudiddy
 Share

Ketchup on eggs?  

99 members have voted

  1. 1. Ketchup on eggs?



Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I don't hate it, but only on scrambled. Salt and pepper is just fine on any kind of eggs. I like red pepper flakes in them sometimes. I like tobacco or any other kind of hot sauce. Salsa is good as well, but salt and pepper is my go to. 

Tobacco doesn’t sounds too appealing 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

I like ketchup/hot sauce/ or even A1 steak sauce with certain breakfast platters, it’s all tasty to me 

I like a1 on steak too! Don’t care what anyone says. 

I think if it’s some sort of platter or a skillet dinner, it’s acceptable. Just eggs and ketchup, I can’t do that. To each their own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

You only put Texas Pete on eggs.  Anything else is uncivilized. 

I love all things hot and spicy.  But I never tried Texas Pete on my eggs until the last year, just on a whim, because I thought to myself it seemed like a good combo...  my mind was blown.  I love it.  It is also my go-to now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

I like ketchup/hot sauce/ or even A1 steak sauce with certain breakfast platters, it’s all tasty to me 

I like a1 on steak too! Don’t care what anyone says. 

A1 is my A1 for steak.  Love it.

I dont mind ketchup with eggs, sometimes I occasionally crave it when preparing them, but I play it by ear...  my go-to nowadays with eggs is hot sauce (Texas Pete).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...