Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other Games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

I still don't understand the handful of people that are incredibly adamant that Fields is a bust. It's year 2 with 2 different coaching staffs and a horrible supporting cast. Him and Herbert are their only good players on offense

Because they dug in that they didn’t want us to draft him and so now he needs to be a bust so they don’t look stupid. 
 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

I still don't understand the handful of people that are incredibly adamant that Fields is a bust. It's year 2 with 2 different coaching staffs and a horrible supporting cast. Him and Herbert are their only good players on offense

It’s people that don’t like “running QBs” and want to be right about not liking him before the draft. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I still don't understand the handful of people that are incredibly adamant that Fields is a bust. It's year 2 with 2 different coaching staffs and a horrible supporting cast. Him and Herbert are their only good players on offense

He just hasn't looked good enough honestly.  I think people have an attachment to him and they want him to do well.  That's fine.

I don't think he's 100% sure a bust at this point.  Anything can happen.  But he does not look like a franchise QB based on what we have seen so far just IMO.  Not hating on the guy, but it is what it is.  Just my observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I still don't understand the handful of people that are incredibly adamant that Fields is a bust. It's year 2 with 2 different coaching staffs and a horrible supporting cast. Him and Herbert are their only good players on offense

He's not a franchise QB.  Has nothing to do with wanting him or not.  I am glad we didn't draft him and took Horn.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He's not a franchise QB.  Has nothing to do with wanting him or not.  I am glad we didn't draft him and took Horn.  

For the Bears they have to draft a WR and they have the money to get offensive line help this off-season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I still don't understand the handful of people that are incredibly adamant that Fields is a bust. It's year 2 with 2 different coaching staffs and a horrible supporting cast. Him and Herbert are their only good players on offense

Fields is an poor man’s early cam Newton that absolutely can’t read a defense and can’t pass very well. That’s why. All he does well is run.  He won’t last in the nfl because those shots he will take. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny enough, those good games Rico had were when Canales finally put BC at RG. Once BC got hurt, our run game turned to crap again (outside of the GB outlier game)
    • When I say elite, I am talking Bowers and Tony Gonzalez type can't miss prospects. The ones that are the complete package (good athleticism, good blocking, knows how to position body for contested catches, able to run a complete route tree). I also wasn't big on Warren last year (although he at least had the college production) and wasn't sure on Loveland (didn't do enough research on him but was impressed with his route running). I just think TE is a luxury pick for us with how many positions we have that are void of talent. Now, if Sadiq is the best player (by a good margin) our front office thinks is available at 19, then I understand taking him. My worries with Sadiq is if he has to be used like a Pitts, Engram, etc. type TE where they get lined up in the slot because they can't block LBs or Dlinemen. And if that is what happens, it's pretty much like drafting an athletic tall receiver that isn't capable of running a complete route tree. And for how many freaks do we have... you do realize we drafted bum ass XL because we thought he was an athletic freak. Turns out that athleticism doesn't mean crap when you are dumb as rocks, can't run routes, and can't catch the ball...  I feel like we have been drafting guys that are displaying elite athleticism at the combine over college production (and I think that has shown why a lot of our drafts prior to last year have sucked)
    • He'll be out for 6-9 months at a minimum, possibly even 12 months and he'll never recover the explosion he once had - if he even comes back (I think it ends the career of like 20% of players that suffer it). If the research I did on the injury is correct (it was a while ago).
×
×
  • Create New...